Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Personalized Differential Privacy for Ridge Regression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.17127 v1 pith:WN5PMDCR submitted 2024-01-30 cs.LG cs.CRcs.CY

classification cs.LGcs.CRcs.CY
keywords privacydatapdp-opaccuracypersonalizedpointdifferentdifferential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The increased application of machine learning (ML) in sensitive domains requires protecting the training data through privacy frameworks, such as differential privacy (DP). DP requires to specify a uniform privacy level $\varepsilon$ that expresses the maximum privacy loss that each data point in the entire dataset is willing to tolerate. Yet, in practice, different data points often have different privacy requirements. Having to set one uniform privacy level is usually too restrictive, often forcing a learner to guarantee the stringent privacy requirement, at a large cost to accuracy. To overcome this limitation, we introduce our novel Personalized-DP Output Perturbation method (PDP-OP) that enables to train Ridge regression models with individual per data point privacy levels. We provide rigorous privacy proofs for our PDP-OP as well as accuracy guarantees for the resulting model. This work is the first to provide such theoretical accuracy guarantees when it comes to personalized DP in machine learning, whereas previous work only provided empirical evaluations. We empirically evaluate PDP-OP on synthetic and real datasets and with diverse privacy distributions. We show that by enabling each data point to specify their own privacy requirement, we can significantly improve the privacy-accuracy trade-offs in DP. We also show that PDP-OP outperforms the personalized privacy techniques of Jorgensen et al. (2015).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gaze3P: Gaze-Based Prediction of User-Perceived Privacy

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Gaze patterns predict users' perceived privacy ratings with moderate accuracy, and the ratings can be mapped to differential privacy noise levels that improve utility over static and random baselines.

  2. Managing Correlations in Data and Privacy Demand

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AHDP, an add-remove heterogeneous differential privacy framework, protects both user data and the user's privacy demand, and correlation-agnostic mechanisms exist for mean, frequency, and linear regression estimation.

Pith tools