Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

EEG-GPT: Exploring Capabilities of Large Language Models for EEG Classification and Interpretation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.18006 v2 pith:ORBF34QV submitted 2024-01-31 q-bio.QM cs.LGeess.SP

classification q-bio.QMcs.LGeess.SP
keywords approachesclassificationeeg-gptlearningmodelsscalesacrossapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In conventional machine learning (ML) approaches applied to electroencephalography (EEG), this is often a limited focus, isolating specific brain activities occurring across disparate temporal scales (from transient spikes in milliseconds to seizures lasting minutes) and spatial scales (from localized high-frequency oscillations to global sleep activity). This siloed approach limits the development EEG ML models that exhibit multi-scale electrophysiological understanding and classification capabilities. Moreover, typical ML EEG approaches utilize black-box approaches, limiting their interpretability and trustworthiness in clinical contexts. Thus, we propose EEG-GPT, a unifying approach to EEG classification that leverages advances in large language models (LLM). EEG-GPT achieves excellent performance comparable to current state-of-the-art deep learning methods in classifying normal from abnormal EEG in a few-shot learning paradigm utilizing only 2% of training data. Furthermore, it offers the distinct advantages of providing intermediate reasoning steps and coordinating specialist EEG tools across multiple scales in its operation, offering transparent and interpretable step-by-step verification, thereby promoting trustworthiness in clinical contexts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EasyBCI Agent: Towards Universal Neural Data Preprocessing for Brain-Computer Interfaces

    q-bio.QM 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Domain-specific LLM orchestration preserves more task-relevant EEG signal than a manual pipeline or general-purpose coding agents on one small private dataset, and extends to five other modalities.

  2. WorldWeaver: Generating Long-Horizon Video Worlds via Rich Perception

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    WorldWeaver reduces temporal drift in long-horizon video generation by jointly modeling RGB and depth perceptual conditions with segmented noise scheduling.

  3. From Theory to Application: Fine-Tuning Large EEG Model with Real-World Stress Data

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning the LaBraM EEG foundation model on 82 real-world classroom stress recordings yields 90.47% balanced accuracy in the best of four seeds, but the tiny, seed-dependent test set makes the headline fragile.

  4. Foundation Models for Cross-Domain EEG Analysis Application: A Survey

    cs.HC 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes EEG foundation-model research into five output-modality categories: native EEG, text, vision, audio, and multimodal fusion, with a claim to be the first such comprehensive taxonomy.

  5. Large Language Models for EEG: A Comprehensive Survey and Taxonomy

    eess.SP 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A taxonomy and review of studies applying large language models to EEG signals, organized into four domains and three adaptation strategies.

  6. Large Language models for Time Series Analysis: Techniques, Applications, and Challenges

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review of LLM-based time series analysis that proposes several taxonomies, but is undermined by citation errors and a lack of systematic methodology.

Pith tools