Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Large Language models for Time Series Analysis: Techniques, Applications, and Challenges

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Survey maps how LLMs handle time series, from prompts to pruning.

desk verdict A useful taxonomy wrapped around a factually unreliable citation core; needs a correction pass before it can serve as a reference. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.11040 v1 pith:PH4SHXAC submitted 2025-05-21 cs.LG cs.CLcs.ET

Feifei Shi , Xueyan Yin , Kang Wang , Wanyu Tu , Qifu Sun , Huansheng Ning This is my paper
classification cs.LGcs.CLcs.ET
keywords largelanguagemodelstimeseriesanalysissurveytemporalfoundationretrieval-augmentedgenerationmodelcompressionforecastingpromptingstrategies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a systematic review arguing that pre-trained large language models have become a viable general-purpose engine for time series analysis, organized around enabling techniques, applications, and challenges. It claims the field is evolving through three stages: early machine learning, the current LLM-driven paradigm, and native temporal foundation models. The value the paper offers is a workflow-based taxonomy covering input techniques, optimization techniques, and lightweight deployment. If the survey's organization is accurate, it gives researchers a structured reference for choosing and combining LLM techniques for time series tasks, and clarifies where the open problems lie.

What carries the argument

The central organizing device is the workflow taxonomy in Figure 2, which divides LLM-driven time series analysis into an input stage (prompting strategies such as zero/few-shot prompting, chain-of-thought variants, and temporal alignment), an optimization stage (fine-tuning and retrieval-augmented generation), and a lightweight stage (knowledge distillation, quantization, and pruning). A second organizing device is the data-information-knowledge-wisdom hierarchy of Figure 3, used to arrange LLM-augmented methods as data augmentation, feature augmentation, or model augmentation. These taxonomies carry the argument by turning a scattered literature into a decision map; the paper's claims about the field's evolution and open challenges are stated in terms of these categories.

What would settle it

A reader could take a sample of ten methods described in the survey, open the cited papers, and check whether the described mechanism, claimed accuracy, and task match the source; the central claim would be falsified if a substantial fraction of these checks fail, and the mislabeling of [20] as 'Performer' plus the classification of ViLBERT as a time series model already provide two concrete test points.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a structured synthesis: pre-trained LLMs can be adapted to time series analysis by treating input formatting, parameter optimization, and model compression as three separable workflow stages, and the field is moving toward purpose-built temporal foundation models that internalize time series structure rather than borrowing language-model machinery. The paper supports this by organizing recent methods into a hierarchy of data augmentation, feature augmentation, and model augmentation, and by cataloging applications in anomaly detection, boundary detection, forecasting, and semantic segmentation. It claims that LLM-based methods already outperform specialized models in some zero- and few-shot settings, while still facing computational, privacy, interpretability, real-time, and data-scarcity barriers. This is a survey rather than a new empirical result, so its core claim is that the proposed organizational scheme captures the state of the art and that its identified challenges are the ones that will shape future work.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's value as a reliable reference rests on the assumption that every cited paper is described accurately and that its taxonomies faithfully capture the field; this assumption is already strained by the section that calls reference [20] 'Performer' although the cited paper is titled 'Pyraformer,' and by the listing of ViLBERT, a vision-language model, as a time series model.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the taxonomy is right, practitioners can select techniques by workflow stage: prompt and temporal-alignment techniques for input, fine-tuning and retrieval-augmented generation for optimization, and distillation, quantization, or pruning for deployment, rather than treating each method as an isolated case.
  • The roadmap implies that native temporal foundation models, rather than further adaptations of text-trained LLMs, are the likely next direction for the field.
  • The survey's challenge list implies that progress on computational efficiency, privacy, interpretability, real-time processing, and data scarcity will determine whether LLM-based time series analysis moves from research prototypes into industrial deployment.
  • Reported results across many cited studies suggest LLMs can serve as competitive zero-shot forecasters and few-shot classifiers, reducing reliance on labeled data in some time series tasks.
  • Applications such as anomaly detection, boundary detection, forecasting, and semantic segmentation are claimed to already benefit from LLMs, so these tasks are the most plausible early targets for production systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's evidence is entirely secondhand; a stronger version of its central claim would require a benchmark that runs the described methods on the same datasets under the same protocol, which no survey can supply.
  • The workflow taxonomy could be extended into a decision procedure: given a time series task, data budget, and latency constraint, choose input, optimization, and lightweight techniques by matching these three axes; the survey's categories make that procedure imaginable but do not validate it.
  • The mislabeled reference to 'Performer' for Pyraformer suggests citation-level errors may exist elsewhere, so the survey's reliability as a reference could be tested by checking each cited description against its source paper.
  • A concrete follow-up would be to add a reproducibility appendix that records exact datasets, metrics, and model versions for every cited result, turning the taxonomy into a living benchmark rather than a static map.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a survey of large language model (LLM) approaches for time series analysis, organizing the field into an evolutionary roadmap (from traditional machine learning to native temporal foundation models), a workflow-based taxonomy of techniques (input, optimization, and lightweight stages), a hierarchical classification of LLM-augmented models, application areas, and open challenges. The paper explicitly claims to be a 'systematic review' and to serve as a 'foundational reference' for researchers.

Significance. If the survey were accurate, it could be a useful entry point for researchers seeking an organized overview of a fast-moving area. The proposed taxonomies, particularly the workflow-oriented division of input, optimization, and lightweight techniques, are reasonable organizing principles. However, the paper's value hinges on the reliability of its citations and model attributions. The manuscript contains multiple verifiable citation-content mismatches and misclassifications, and it lacks the methodological apparatus usually expected of a systematic review. As such, the central claim of serving as a dependable foundational reference is not substantiated in the current version.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section II.C] The text states that 'the Performer [20] uses pyramidal attention structures to balance the short and long-term dependency capture with linear computational complexity.' Reference [20] is Liu et al., 'Pyraformer: Low-complexity pyramidal attention for long-range time series modeling and forecasting' (2022), not Performer. Performer (Choromanski et al.) is a different linear-attention approximation, while pyramidal attention is precisely Pyraformer's mechanism. The description matches the cited reference, but the model name is wrong, so a reader would be directed to the wrong paper.
  2. [Section II.B; Section III.A.1.a] The paper credits Time-LLM [15] with two claims that are not in the cited paper. First, Section II.B states that Time-LLM 'achieved an accuracy of 92.1% in the MIT-BIH arrhythmia classification task,' but reference [15] (Jin et al., 'Time-LLM: Time series forecasting by reprogramming large language models') is a forecasting work that does not report an ECG classification benchmark. Second, Section III.A.1.a states 'Jin et al. [15] demonstrated that LLMTime could stimulate the zero-sample time series learning ability,' but LLMTime is the method of Gruver et al. [13], not Time-LLM. These are citation-content mismatches that misattribute results.
  3. [Table II; Section IV.C] ViLBERT [98] is listed in Table II as a general-purpose time series model whose task is 'Categorisation' and whose architecture is 'Expansion of the BERT model.' In fact, [98] is Lu et al.'s vision-and-language pretraining model, which has no time series component. The text in Section IV.C only says ViLBERT 'has inspired adaptations for time series analysis,' which does not justify its inclusion as a model in an LLM-augmented time series table. Furthermore, the same table lists TSMixer [106] and PatchTST [107], which are standard deep learning time series models that do not involve LLMs; labeling them as 'Models for time series analysis augmented by LLMs' is misleading.
  4. [Section III.B.1; Section IV.A] Reference [48] is inconsistently cited. In Section III.B.1, the text says 'Zhou et al. [48] employed pre-trained models based on massive text and image data, and adapted to time series tasks through fine-tuning.' In Section IV.A, the same reference number is attributed to 'Xie et al. [48] introduced ChatTS.' The bibliography entry [48] is Xie et al., 'ChatTS: Aligning time series with llms via synthetic data for enhanced understanding and reasoning' (2024). These two attributions cannot both be correct, and the discrepancy indicates a fundamental citation-mapping error.
  5. [Abstract; Section I; Section VII] The paper repeatedly calls itself a 'systematic review,' but it does not report any of the standard elements of a systematic review: search strategy, databases queried, inclusion/exclusion criteria, screening process, or selection rationale. Without such a protocol, the selection of references appears arbitrary rather than systematic. This omission, combined with the citation errors documented above, undermines the paper's stated goal of serving as a foundational reference for the community.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section III.A] The introductory paragraph uses 'promoting strategies' twice, but the subsection title and the rest of the text use 'prompting strategies.' This inconsistency should be fixed.
  2. [Section III] The text says 'LLMs' input, optimization, and quantification stages,' but the third stage is elsewhere called the 'lightweight' stage and the relevant technique is 'quantization.' The term 'quantification' is a typo.
  3. [Section II.C] The phrase 'ProSparse Attention [4]' is likely a typo for 'ProbSparse attention,' the mechanism of Informer, which is reference [4]. If a different model is intended, the citation should be corrected.
  4. [References] Reference [20] contains the placeholder text '# PLACEHOLDER PARENT METADATA VALUE#' instead of the publication venue, indicating an unresolved citation-processing issue.
  5. [Throughout] The manuscript contains multiple typographical errors, including 'modling' (Section II.C), 'signicant' (Section VII), and 'LLms' (Section I). These should be corrected in a thorough copyedit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the survey's organizational claims describe external literature and no derivation or prediction reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

This paper is a literature survey. Its central claim is that it 'presents a systematic review of pre-trained LLM-driven time series analysis, focusing on enabling techniques, potential applications, and open challenges,' which is a descriptive and organizational claim about an external body of work. There are no equations, fitted parameters, or derived predictions that could reduce to the paper's own inputs. The taxonomies (evolution roadmap, workflow stages, DIKW-inspired levels) are classification schemes, not results computed from the papers being classified. The paper does not invoke any uniqueness theorem, self-citation chain, or prior work by the same authors to force a conclusion. Identified issues such as calling Pyraformer 'Performer' in Section II.C, crediting Time-LLM with a MIT-BIH accuracy not present in the cited paper, and listing ViLBERT as a time series model in Table II are accuracy and reliability problems in a survey, but they are not circularity: the survey's assertions are not equivalent to their inputs by construction. Because no load-bearing reduction to inputs or self-citation chain exists, the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey introduces no free parameters or invented entities. Its load-bearing assumptions are about the accuracy of its literature representation and the validity of its organizational categories.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The cited papers are accurately described and categorized.
    The survey's central value rests on faithful representation of each cited work; examples in Sections II.C, IV.C, and Table II suggest this assumption is violated.
  • domain assumption The proposed taxonomies (evolution roadmap, workflow stages, DIKW hierarchy) are a meaningful organization of the field.
    The paper presents these frameworks as its main contribution but does not justify them against alternative taxonomies already present in prior surveys.
  • domain assumption LLMs can be adapted to time series tasks through the listed techniques (prompting, fine-tuning, RAG, distillation, quantization, pruning).
    This is the enabling premise of the entire survey, cited from the literature; the survey does not test it directly.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Large Language models for Time Series Analysis: Techniques, Applications, and Challenges." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PH4SHXAC

@misc{pith2026250611040,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Large Language models for Time Series Analysis: Techniques, Applications, and Challenges},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PH4SHXAC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11040}
}
read the original abstract

Time series analysis is pivotal in domains like financial forecasting and biomedical monitoring, yet traditional methods are constrained by limited nonlinear feature representation and long-term dependency capture. The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) offers transformative potential by leveraging their cross-modal knowledge integration and inherent attention mechanisms for time series analysis. However, the development of general-purpose LLMs for time series from scratch is still hindered by data diversity, annotation scarcity, and computational requirements. This paper presents a systematic review of pre-trained LLM-driven time series analysis, focusing on enabling techniques, potential applications, and open challenges. First, it establishes an evolutionary roadmap of AI-driven time series analysis, from the early machine learning era, through the emerging LLM-driven paradigm, to the development of native temporal foundation models. Second, it organizes and systematizes the technical landscape of LLM-driven time series analysis from a workflow perspective, covering LLMs' input, optimization, and lightweight stages. Finally, it critically examines novel real-world applications and highlights key open challenges that can guide future research and innovation. The work not only provides valuable insights into current advances but also outlines promising directions for future development. It serves as a foundational reference for both academic and industrial researchers, paving the way for the development of more efficient, generalizable, and interpretable systems of LLM-driven time series analysis.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.11040 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The Evolution Roadmap of AI-driven Time Series Analysis. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The technical taxonomy of LLM-driven time series analysis. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The structured hierarchy describing LLMs’ augmentation in time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MemCast: Memory-Driven Time Series Forecasting with Experience-Conditioned Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-02 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    MemCast claims LLM time-series forecasting improves when retrieval from a hierarchical memory of patterns, wisdom, and laws conditions reasoning, but the reported gains depend on a test-label-rewarded confidence update.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [20]

    Pyraformer: Low-complexity pyramidal attention for long-range time series modeling and forecasting,

    S. Liu, H. Yu, C. Liao, J. Li, W. Lin, A. X. Liu, and S. Dustdar, “Pyraformer: Low-complexity pyramidal attention for long-range time series modeling and forecasting,” in# PLACE- HOLDER PARENT METADATA VALUE#, 2022

    2022

  2. [4]

    Informer: Beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time-series forecasting,

    H. Zhou, S. Zhang, J. Peng, S. Zhang, J. Li, H. Xiong, and W. Zhang, “Informer: Beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time-series forecasting,” inProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 35, no. 12, 2021, pp. 11 106–11 115

    2021

  3. [15]

    Time-llm: Time series fore- casting by reprogramming large language models,

    M. Jin, S. Wang, L. Ma, Z. Chu, J. Y . Zhang, X. Shi, P.-Y . Chen, Y . Liang, Y .-F. Li, S. Panet al., “Time-llm: Time series fore- casting by reprogramming large language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.01728, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  4. [13]

    Large language models are zero-shot time series forecasters,

    N. Gruver, M. Finzi, S. Qiu, and A. G. Wilson, “Large language models are zero-shot time series forecasters,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 19 622–19 635, 2023

    2023

  5. [98]

    Vilbert: Pretraining task- agnostic visiolinguistic representations for vision-and-language tasks,

    J. Lu, D. Batra, D. Parikh, and S. Lee, “Vilbert: Pretraining task- agnostic visiolinguistic representations for vision-and-language tasks,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 32, 2019

    work page 2019

  6. [106]

    Tsmixer: Lightweight mlp-mixer model for multivariate time series forecasting,

    V . Ekambaram, A. Jati, N. Nguyen, P. Sinthong, and J. Kalagnanam, “Tsmixer: Lightweight mlp-mixer model for multivariate time series forecasting,” inProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 2023, pp. 459–469

    work page 2023

  7. [107]

    A time series is worth 64 words: Long-term forecasting with transformers,

    Y . Nie, N. H. Nguyen, P. Sinthong, and J. Kalagnanam, “A time series is worth 64 words: Long-term forecasting with transformers,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.14730, 2022

    arXiv 2022

  8. [48]

    Chatts: Aligning time series with llms via synthetic data for enhanced understanding and reasoning,

    Z. Xie, Z. Li, X. He, L. Xu, X. Wen, T. Zhang, J. Chen, R. Shi, and D. Pei, “Chatts: Aligning time series with llms via synthetic data for enhanced understanding and reasoning,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03104, 2024

    arXiv 2024

Show all 124 references
  1. [1]

    J. D. Cryer,Time series analysis. Duxbury Press Boston, 1986, vol. 286

    1986

  2. [2]

    Time series analysis using autoregressive integrated moving average (arima) models,

    B. K. Nelson, “Time series analysis using autoregressive integrated moving average (arima) models,”Academic emergency medicine, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 739–744, 1998

    1998

  3. [3]

    State space modeling of multiple time series,

    M. Aoki and A. Havenner, “State space modeling of multiple time series,”Econometric Reviews, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–59, 1991

    1991

  4. [5]

    Temporal fusion transformers for interpretable multi-horizon time series forecasting,

    B. Lim, S. ¨O. Arık, N. Loeff, and T. Pfister, “Temporal fusion transformers for interpretable multi-horizon time series forecasting,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1748–1764, 2021

    2021

  5. [6]

    A survey of large language models,

    W. X. Zhao, K. Zhou, J. Li, T. Tang, X. Wang, Y . Hou, Y . Min, B. Zhang, J. Zhang, Z. Donget al., “A survey of large language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.18223, vol. 1, no. 2, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  6. [7]

    A survey of time series foundation models: Generalizing time series representation with large language model,

    J. Ye, W. Zhang, K. Yi, Y . Yu, Z. Li, J. Li, and F. Tsung, “A survey of time series foundation models: Generalizing time series representation with large language model,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.02358, 2024

    2024

  7. [8]

    Empowering time series analysis with large language models: A survey,

    Y . Jiang, Z. Pan, X. Zhang, S. Garg, A. Schneider, Y . Nevmyvaka, and D. Song, “Empowering time series analysis with large language models: A survey,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03182, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  8. [9]

    Deep learning-based time series forecasting,

    X. Song, L. Deng, H. Wang, Y . Zhang, Y . He, and W. Cao, “Deep learning-based time series forecasting,”Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 58, no. 1, p. 23, 2024

    2024

  9. [10]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 30, 2017. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2021 13

    2017

  10. [11]

    Learning graph structures with transformer for multivariate time-series anomaly detection in iot,

    Z. Chen, D. Chen, X. Zhang, Z. Yuan, and X. Cheng, “Learning graph structures with transformer for multivariate time-series anomaly detection in iot,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 9179–9189, 2021

    2021

  11. [12]

    Language mod- els are few-shot learners,

    T. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. D. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, A. Askellet al., “Language mod- els are few-shot learners,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 1877–1901, 2020

    1901

  12. [14]

    Test: Text prototype aligned embedding to activate llm’s ability for time series,

    C. Sun, H. Li, Y . Li, and S. Hong, “Test: Text prototype aligned embedding to activate llm’s ability for time series,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08241, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  13. [16]

    Insight miner: A large-scale multimodal model for insight mining from time series,

    Y . Zhang, Y . Zhang, M. Zheng, K. Chen, C. Gao, R. Ge, S. Teng, A. Jelloul, J. Rao, X. Guoet al., “Insight miner: A large-scale multimodal model for insight mining from time series,” inNeurIPS 2023 AI for Science Workshop, 2023

    2023

  14. [17]

    A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecasting,

    A. Das, W. Kong, R. Sen, and Y . Zhou, “A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecasting,” inForty-first International Confer- ence on Machine Learning, 2024

    2024

  15. [18]

    Lag-llama: Towards foundation models for probabilistic time series forecasting,

    K. Rasul, A. Ashok, A. R. Williams, H. Ghonia, R. Bhagwatkar, A. Khorasani, M. J. D. Bayazi, G. Adamopoulos, R. Riachi, N. Hassen et al., “Lag-llama: Towards foundation models for probabilistic time series forecasting,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08278, 2023

    arXiv

  16. [19]

    Units: A unified multi-task time series model,

    S. Gao, T. Koker, O. Queen, T. Hartvigsen, T. Tsiligkaridis, and M. Zitnik, “Units: A unified multi-task time series model,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 140 589–140 631, 2024

    2024

  17. [21]

    Meta- learning for few-shot time series classification,

    J. Narwariya, P. Malhotra, L. Vig, G. Shroff, and T. V . Vishnu, “Meta- learning for few-shot time series classification,” inProceedings of the 7th ACM IKDD CoDS and 25th COMAD, ser. CoDS COMAD 2020. Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, p. 28–36

    2020

  18. [22]

    Time-ffm: Towards lm-empowered federated foundation model for time series forecasting,

    Q. Liu, X. Liu, C. Liu, Q. Wen, and Y . Liang, “Time-ffm: Towards lm-empowered federated foundation model for time series forecasting,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14252, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  19. [23]

    Language models are unsupervised multitask learners,

    A. Radford, J. Wu, R. Child, D. Luan, D. Amodei, I. Sutskeveret al., “Language models are unsupervised multitask learners,”OpenAI blog, vol. 1, no. 8, p. 9, 2019

    2019

  20. [24]

    Crosslingual generalization through multitask finetuning (2022),

    N. Muennighoff, T. Wang, L. Sutawika, A. Roberts, S. Biderman, T. Scao, M. S. Bari, S. Shen, Z. X. Yong, H. Schoelkopfet al., “Crosslingual generalization through multitask finetuning (2022),” arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.01786, 2023

    2022 arXiv

  21. [25]

    Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models,

    H. Touvron, T. Lavril, G. Izacard, X. Martinet, M.-A. Lachaux, T. Lacroix, B. Rozi `ere, N. Goyal, E. Hambro, F. Azharet al., “Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  22. [26]

    Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models,

    H. Touvron, L. Martin, K. Stone, P. Albert, A. Almahairi, Y . Babaei, N. Bashlykov, S. Batra, P. Bhargava, S. Bhosaleet al., “Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  23. [27]

    Promptcast: A new prompt-based learning paradigm for time series forecasting,

    H. Xue and F. D. Salim, “Promptcast: A new prompt-based learning paradigm for time series forecasting,”IEEE Transactions on Knowl- edge and Data Engineering, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 6851–6864, 2023

    2023

  24. [28]

    Exploring large-scale language models to evaluate eeg-based multimodal data for mental health,

    Y . Hu, S. Zhang, T. Dang, H. Jia, F. D. Salim, W. Hu, and A. J. Quigley, “Exploring large-scale language models to evaluate eeg-based multimodal data for mental health,” pp. 412–417, 2024

    2024

  25. [29]

    Auto- prompt: Eliciting knowledge from language models with automatically generated prompts,

    T. Shin, Y . Razeghi, R. L. Logan IV , E. Wallace, and S. Singh, “Auto- prompt: Eliciting knowledge from language models with automatically generated prompts,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.15980, 2020

    2010 arXiv

  26. [30]

    How can we know what language models know?

    Z. Jiang, F. F. Xu, J. Araki, and G. Neubig, “How can we know what language models know?”Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 8, pp. 423–438, 2020

    2020

  27. [31]

    Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,

    J. Wei, X. Wang, D. Schuurmans, M. Bosma, F. Xia, E. Chi, Q. V . Le, D. Zhouet al., “Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 35, pp. 24 824–24 837, 2022

    2022

  28. [32]

    Multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning in language models,

    Z. Zhang, A. Zhang, M. Li, H. Zhao, G. Karypis, and A. Smola, “Multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning in language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.00923, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  29. [33]

    Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models,

    S. Yao, D. Yu, J. Zhao, I. Shafran, T. Griffiths, Y . Cao, and K. Narasimhan, “Tree of thoughts: Deliberate problem solving with large language models,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 36, pp. 11 809–11 822, 2023

    2023

  30. [34]

    Graph of thoughts: Solving elaborate problems with large language models,

    M. Besta, N. Blach, A. Kubicek, R. Gerstenberger, M. Podstawski, L. Gianinazzi, J. Gajda, T. Lehmann, H. Niewiadomski, P. Nyczyk et al., “Graph of thoughts: Solving elaborate problems with large language models,” vol. 38, no. 16, pp. 17 682–17 690, 2024

    2024

  31. [35]

    Eeg-gpt: exploring capabilities of large language models for eeg classification and interpretation,

    J. W. Kim, A. Alaa, and D. Bernardo, “Eeg-gpt: exploring capabilities of large language models for eeg classification and interpretation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.18006, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  32. [36]

    Large language models are reasoning teachers,

    N. Ho, L. Schmid, and S.-Y . Yun, “Large language models are reasoning teachers,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10071, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  33. [37]

    Ticktack: Long span temporal alignment of large language models leveraging sexagenary cycle time expression,

    X. Han, Q. Hu, Y . Wang, W. Gao, L. Zhang, Q. Wang, L. Mei, C. Deng, and J. Feng, “Ticktack: Long span temporal alignment of large language models leveraging sexagenary cycle time expression,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.04150, 2025

    2025

  34. [38]

    Large models for time series and spatio-temporal data: A survey and outlook,

    M. Jin, Q. Wen, Y . Liang, C. Zhang, S. Xue, X. Wang, J. Zhang, Y . Wang, H. Chen, X. Liet al., “Large models for time series and spatio-temporal data: A survey and outlook,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10196, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  35. [39]

    Open vocabulary electroencephalography-to-text decoding and zero-shot sentiment classification,

    Z. Wang and H. Ji, “Open vocabulary electroencephalography-to-text decoding and zero-shot sentiment classification,” vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 5350–5358, 2022

    2022

  36. [40]

    Medtsllm: Leveraging llms for multimodal medical time series analysis,

    N. Chan, F. Parker, W. Bennett, T. Wu, M. Y . Jia, J. Fackler, and K. Ghobadi, “Medtsllm: Leveraging llms for multimodal medical time series analysis,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.07773, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  37. [41]

    Temporal data meets llm–explainable financial time series forecasting,

    X. Yu, Z. Chen, Y . Ling, S. Dong, Z. Liu, and Y . Lu, “Temporal data meets llm–explainable financial time series forecasting,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11025, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  38. [42]

    From news to forecast: Integrating event analysis in llm-based time series forecasting with reflection,

    X. Wang, M. Feng, J. Qiu, J. Gu, and J. Zhao, “From news to forecast: Integrating event analysis in llm-based time series forecasting with reflection,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 58 118–58 153, 2024

    2024

  39. [43]

    Health-llm: Large language models for health prediction via wearable sensor data,

    Y . Kim, X. Xu, D. McDuff, C. Breazeal, and H. W. Park, “Health-llm: Large language models for health prediction via wearable sensor data,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.06866, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  40. [44]

    Llm4ts: Aligning pre-trained llms as data-efficient time-series forecasters,

    C. Chang, W.-Y . Wang, W.-C. Peng, and T.-F. Chen, “Llm4ts: Aligning pre-trained llms as data-efficient time-series forecasters,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08469, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  41. [45]

    Tpp-llm: Modeling temporal point processes by efficiently fine-tuning large language models,

    Z. Liu and Y . Quan, “Tpp-llm: Modeling temporal point processes by efficiently fine-tuning large language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02062, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  42. [46]

    Using pre- trained llms for multivariate time series forecasting,

    M. L. Wolff, S. Yang, K. Torkkola, and M. W. Mahoney, “Using pre- trained llms for multivariate time series forecasting,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.06386, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  43. [47]

    Explainable multi-modal time series prediction with llm-in- the-loop,

    Y . Jiang, W. Yu, G. Lee, D. Song, K. Shin, W. Cheng, Y . Liu, and H. Chen, “Explainable multi-modal time series prediction with llm-in- the-loop,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.01013, 2025

    2025

  44. [49]

    Tempo: Prompt-based generative pre-trained transformer for time series forecasting,

    D. Cao, F. Jia, S. O. Arik, T. Pfister, Y . Zheng, W. Ye, and Y . Liu, “Tempo: Prompt-based generative pre-trained transformer for time series forecasting,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.04948, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  45. [50]

    Llama-time: Fine-tuning a large language model for advanced time series prediction,

    S. Aghakhani and G. Hu, “Llama-time: Fine-tuning a large language model for advanced time series prediction,” pp. 1–7, 2024

    2024

  46. [51]

    Calf: Aligning llms for time series forecasting via cross-modal fine-tuning,

    P. Liu, H. Guo, T. Dai, N. Li, J. Bao, X. Ren, Y . Jiang, and S.-T. Xia, “Calf: Aligning llms for time series forecasting via cross-modal fine-tuning,” vol. 39, no. 18, pp. 18 915–18 923, 2025

    2025

  47. [52]

    Retrieval- augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks,

    P. Lewis, E. Perez, A. Piktus, F. Petroni, V . Karpukhin, N. Goyal, H. K ¨uttler, M. Lewis, W.-t. Yih, T. Rockt ¨aschelet al., “Retrieval- augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 9459–9474, 2020

    2020

  48. [53]

    Retrieval augmented time series forecasting,

    K. Tire, E. O. Taga, M. E. Ildiz, and S. Oymak, “Retrieval augmented time series forecasting,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.08249, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  49. [54]

    Timeraf: Retrieval-augmented foundation model for zero-shot time series forecasting,

    H. Zhang, C. Xu, Y .-F. Zhang, Z. Zhang, L. Wang, J. Bian, and T. Tan, “Timeraf: Retrieval-augmented foundation model for zero-shot time series forecasting,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.20810, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  50. [55]

    Timerag: Boosting llm time series forecasting via retrieval-augmented generation,

    S. Yang, D. Wang, H. Zheng, and R. Jin, “Timerag: Boosting llm time series forecasting via retrieval-augmented generation,” inICASSP 2025-2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–5. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, ...

    2025

  51. [56]

    Simple is effective: The roles of graphs and large language models in knowledge-graph-based retrieval-augmented generation,

    M. Li, S. Miao, and P. Li, “Simple is effective: The roles of graphs and large language models in knowledge-graph-based retrieval-augmented generation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.20724, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  52. [57]

    Hy- bridrag: Integrating knowledge graphs and vector retrieval augmented generation for efficient information extraction,

    B. Sarmah, D. Mehta, B. Hall, R. Rao, S. Patel, and S. Pasquali, “Hy- bridrag: Integrating knowledge graphs and vector retrieval augmented generation for efficient information extraction,” pp. 608–616, 2024

    2024

  53. [58]

    Structrag: Boosting knowledge intensive reasoning of llms via inference-time hybrid information structurization,

    Z. Li, X. Chen, H. Yu, H. Lin, Y . Lu, Q. Tang, F. Huang, X. Han, L. Sun, and Y . Li, “Structrag: Boosting knowledge intensive reasoning of llms via inference-time hybrid information structurization,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08815, 2024

    arXiv

  54. [59]

    A survey on model com- pression for large language models,

    X. Zhu, J. Li, Y . Liu, C. Ma, and W. Wang, “A survey on model com- pression for large language models,”Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 12, pp. 1556–1577, 2024

    2024

  55. [60]

    In-context learning dis- tillation: Transferring few-shot learning ability of pre-trained language models,

    Y . Huang, Y . Chen, Z. Yu, and K. McKeown, “In-context learning dis- tillation: Transferring few-shot learning ability of pre-trained language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10670, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  56. [61]

    Less is more: Task-aware layer-wise distillation for language model compres- sion,

    C. Liang, S. Zuo, Q. Zhang, P. He, W. Chen, and T. Zhao, “Less is more: Task-aware layer-wise distillation for language model compres- sion,” pp. 20 852–20 867, 2023

    2023

  57. [62]

    Contrastive adversarial knowledge distillation for deep model compression in time- series regression tasks,

    Q. Xu, Z. Chen, M. Ragab, C. Wang, M. Wu, and X. Li, “Contrastive adversarial knowledge distillation for deep model compression in time- series regression tasks,”Neurocomputing, vol. 485, pp. 242–251, 2022

    2022

  58. [63]

    Lightts: Lightweight time series classification with adaptive ensemble distillation,

    D. Campos, M. Zhang, B. Yang, T. Kieu, C. Guo, and C. S. Jensen, “Lightts: Lightweight time series classification with adaptive ensemble distillation,”Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–27, 2023

    2023

  59. [64]

    Timedistill: Efficient long-term time series forecasting with mlp via cross-architecture dis- tillation,

    J. Ni, Z. Liu, S. Wang, M. Jin, and W. Jin, “Timedistill: Efficient long-term time series forecasting with mlp via cross-architecture dis- tillation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.15016, 2025

    2025

  60. [65]

    Energy-efficient transformer inference: Optimization strategies for time series classification,

    A. Kermani, E. Zeraatkar, and H. Irani, “Energy-efficient transformer inference: Optimization strategies for time series classification,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16627, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  61. [66]

    Llm-qat: Data-free quantization aware training for large language models,

    Z. Liu, B. Oguz, C. Zhao, E. Chang, P. Stock, Y . Mehdad, Y . Shi, R. Kr- ishnamoorthi, and V . Chandra, “Llm-qat: Data-free quantization aware training for large language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.17888, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  62. [67]

    Sparsegpt: Massive language models can be accurately pruned in one-shot,

    E. Frantar and D. Alistarh, “Sparsegpt: Massive language models can be accurately pruned in one-shot,” pp. 10 323–10 337, 2023

    2023

  63. [68]

    Importance estimation for neural network pruning,

    P. Molchanov, A. Mallya, S. Tyree, I. Frosio, and J. Kautz, “Importance estimation for neural network pruning,” pp. 11 264–11 272, 2019

    2019

  64. [69]

    Llm-pruner: On the structural pruning of large language models,

    X. Ma, G. Fang, and X. Wang, “Llm-pruner: On the structural pruning of large language models,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 36, pp. 21 702–21 720, 2023

    2023

  65. [70]

    Llm-based knowledge pruning for time series data analytics on edge-computing devices,

    R. Jin, Q. Xu, M. Wu, Y . Xu, D. Li, X. Li, and Z. Chen, “Llm-based knowledge pruning for time series data analytics on edge-computing devices,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08765, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  66. [71]

    Parameter-efficient and student-friendly knowledge distillation,

    J. Rao, X. Meng, L. Ding, S. Qi, X. Liu, M. Zhang, and D. Tao, “Parameter-efficient and student-friendly knowledge distillation,”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 26, pp. 4230–4241, 2023

    2023

  67. [72]

    Knowledge distillation vs. pretraining from scratch under a fixed (computation) budget,

    M. D. Bui, F. D. Schmidt, G. Glava ˇs, and K. V on Der Wense, “Knowledge distillation vs. pretraining from scratch under a fixed (computation) budget,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.19319, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  68. [73]

    The knowledge pyramid: the dikw hierarchy,

    M. Frick ´e, “The knowledge pyramid: the dikw hierarchy,”Ko Knowl- edge organization, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 33–46, 2019

    2019

  69. [74]

    Geng: An llm-based generic time series data generation approach for edge intelligence via cross-domain collaboration,

    X. Zhou, Q. Jia, Y . Hu, R. Xie, T. Huang, and F. R. Yu, “Geng: An llm-based generic time series data generation approach for edge intelligence via cross-domain collaboration,” inIEEE INFOCOM 2024- IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFO- COM WKSHPS). IEEE, ...

    2024

  70. [75]

    Llm2llm: Boosting llms with novel iterative data enhancement,

    N. Lee, T. Wattanawong, S. Kim, K. Mangalam, S. Shen, G. Anu- manchipalli, M. W. Mahoney, K. Keutzer, and A. Gholami, “Llm2llm: Boosting llms with novel iterative data enhancement,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.15042, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  71. [76]

    Position: What can large language models tell us about time series analysis,

    M. Jin, Y . Zhang, W. Chen, K. Zhang, Y . Liang, B. Yang, J. Wang, S. Pan, and Q. Wen, “Position: What can large language models tell us about time series analysis,” inForty-first International Conference on Machine Learning, 2024

    2024

  72. [77]

    Hierarchical multimodal llms with semantic space alignment for enhanced time series classification,

    X. Tao, T. Pan, M. Cheng, and Y . Luo, “Hierarchical multimodal llms with semantic space alignment for enhanced time series classification,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.18686, 2024

    2024

  73. [78]

    Semantic space informed prompt learning with llm for time series forecasting,

    Z. Pan, Y . Jiang, S. Garg, A. Schneider, Y . Nevmyvaka, and D. Song, “Semantic space informed prompt learning with llm for time series forecasting,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05798, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  74. [79]

    Worldgpt: Empowering llm as multimodal world model,

    Z. Ge, H. Huang, M. Zhou, J. Li, G. Wang, S. Tang, and Y . Zhuang, “Worldgpt: Empowering llm as multimodal world model,” inProceed- ings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2024, pp. 7346–7355

    2024

  75. [80]

    Integrating large language model, eeg, and eye-tracking for word-level neural state classification in reading comprehension,

    Y . Zhang, Q. Li, S. Nahata, T. Jamal, S. Cheng, G. Cauwenberghs, and T. Jung, “Integrating large language model, eeg, and eye-tracking for word-level neural state classification in reading comprehension,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol...

    2024

  76. [81]

    Ts2vec: Towards universal representation of time series,

    Z. Yue, Y . Wang, J. Duan, T. Yang, C. Huang, Y . Tong, and B. Xu, “Ts2vec: Towards universal representation of time series,” inProceed- ings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol. 36, no. 8, 2022, pp. 8980–8987

    2022

  77. [82]

    Pre-training enhanced spatial- temporal graph neural network for multivariate time series forecasting,

    Z. Shao, Z. Zhang, F. Wang, and Y . Xu, “Pre-training enhanced spatial- temporal graph neural network for multivariate time series forecasting,” inProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 2022, pp. 1567–1577

    2022

  78. [83]

    Towards time series reasoning with llms,

    W. Chow, L. Gardiner, H. T. Hallgr ´ımsson, M. A. Xu, and S. Y . Ren, “Towards time series reasoning with llms,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11376, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  79. [84]

    A survey of multimodel large language models,

    Z. Liang, Y . Xu, Y . Hong, P. Shang, Q. Wang, Q. Fu, and K. Liu, “A survey of multimodel large language models,” inProceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer, Artificial Intelligence and Control Engineering, 2024, pp. 405–409

    2024

  80. [85]

    Model reprogramming: Resource-efficient cross-domain machine learning,

    P.-Y . Chen, “Model reprogramming: Resource-efficient cross-domain machine learning,” inProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, no. 20, 2024, pp. 22 584–22 591

    2024

  81. [86]

    V oice2series: Reprogram- ming acoustic models for time series classification,

    C.-H. H. Yang, Y .-Y . Tsai, and P.-Y . Chen, “V oice2series: Reprogram- ming acoustic models for time series classification,” inInternational conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2021, pp. 11 808–11 819

    2021

  82. [87]

    Enhance time series modeling by integrating llm,

    C. Chen, G. L. Oliveira, H. Sharifi-Noghabi, and T. Sylvain, “Enhance time series modeling by integrating llm,” inNeurIPS Workshop on Time Series in the Age of Large Models, 2024

    2024

  83. [88]

    Large language models for time series: A survey,

    X. Zhang, R. R. Chowdhury, R. K. Gupta, and J. Shang, “Large language models for time series: A survey,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01801, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  84. [89]

    A dual-stream cross agformer-gpt network for traffic flow prediction based on large-scale road sensor data,

    Y . Sun, Y . Shi, K. Jia, Z. Zhang, and L. Qin, “A dual-stream cross agformer-gpt network for traffic flow prediction based on large-scale road sensor data,”Sensors, vol. 24, no. 12, p. 3905, 2024

    2024

  85. [90]

    Speech emotion recognition using dual-stream representation and cross-attention fusion,

    S. Yu, J. Meng, W. Fan, Y . Chen, B. Zhu, H. Yu, Y . Xie, and Q. Sun, “Speech emotion recognition using dual-stream representation and cross-attention fusion,”Electronics, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 2191, 2024

    2024

  86. [91]

    Long short-term memory,

    S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, “Long short-term memory,”Neural computation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735–1780, 1997

    1997

  87. [92]

    G. E. Box, G. M. Jenkins, G. C. Reinsel, and G. M. Ljung,Time series analysis: forecasting and control. John Wiley & Sons, 2015

    2015

  88. [93]

    Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,

    J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding,” in Proceedings of the 2019 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologi...

    2019

  89. [94]

    A novel hybrid model for stock price forecasting: Combining arima, random forests, and gradient boosting techniques,

    S. Bhuvaneshwari and S. N. Sugirtha Rajini, “A novel hybrid model for stock price forecasting: Combining arima, random forests, and gradient boosting techniques,”Library of Progress-Library Science, Information Technology & Computer, vol. 44, 2024

    2024

  90. [95]

    A survey of ensemble learning: Concepts, algorithms, applications, and prospects,

    I. D. Mienye and Y . Sun, “A survey of ensemble learning: Concepts, algorithms, applications, and prospects,”Ieee Access, vol. 10, pp. 99 129–99 149, 2022

    2022

  91. [96]

    Stacking your transformers: A closer look at model growth for efficient llm pre-training,

    W. Du, T. Luo, Z. Qiu, Z. Huang, Y . Shen, R. Cheng, Y . Guo, and J. Fu, “Stacking your transformers: A closer look at model growth for efficient llm pre-training,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15319, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  92. [97]

    Llm-enhanced multi-teacher knowledge distillation for modality-incomplete emotion recognition in daily healthcare,

    Y . Zhang, H. Liu, Y . Xiao, M. Amoon, D. Zhang, D. Wang, S. Yang, and C. Quek, “Llm-enhanced multi-teacher knowledge distillation for modality-incomplete emotion recognition in daily healthcare,”IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2024

    2024

  93. [99]

    Text2timeseries: Enhanc- ing financial forecasting through time series prediction updates with event-driven insights from large language models,

    L. J. Kurisinkel, P. Mishra, and Y . Zhang, “Text2timeseries: Enhanc- ing financial forecasting through time series prediction updates with event-driven insights from large language models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.03689, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  94. [100]

    Spatial–temporal transformer networks for traffic flow forecasting using a pre-trained language model,

    J. Ma, J. Zhao, and Y . Hou, “Spatial–temporal transformer networks for traffic flow forecasting using a pre-trained language model,”Sensors, vol. 24, no. 17, p. 5502, 2024

    2024

  95. [101]

    Frozen language model helps ecg zero-shot learning,

    J. Li, C. Liu, S. Cheng, R. Arcucci, and S. Hong, “Frozen language model helps ecg zero-shot learning,” pp. 402–415, 2024

    2024

  96. [102]

    Language models can improve event prediction by few- shot abductive reasoning,

    X. Shi, S. Xue, K. Wang, F. Zhou, J. Zhang, J. Zhou, C. Tan, and H. Mei, “Language models can improve event prediction by few- shot abductive reasoning,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 29 532–29 557, 2023. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, ...

    2023

  97. [103]

    Large language models can be zero-shot anomaly detectors for time series?

    S. Alnegheimish, L. Nguyen, L. Berti-Equille, and K. Veeramachaneni, “Large language models can be zero-shot anomaly detectors for time series?”arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.14755, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  98. [104]

    Large language model guided knowledge distillation for time series anomaly detection,

    C. Liu, S. He, Q. Zhou, S. Li, and W. Meng, “Large language model guided knowledge distillation for time series anomaly detection,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.15123, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  99. [105]

    Mtsmae: Masked autoencoders for multivariate time-series forecasting,

    P. Tang and X. Zhang, “Mtsmae: Masked autoencoders for multivariate time-series forecasting,” in2022 IEEE 34th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI). IEEE, 2022, pp. 982–989

    2022

  100. [108]

    Prompt-augmented temporal point process for streaming event sequence,

    S. Xue, Y . Wang, Z. Chu, X. Shi, C. Jiang, H. Hao, G. Jiang, X. Feng, J. Zhang, and J. Zhou, “Prompt-augmented temporal point process for streaming event sequence,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 18 885–18 905, 2023

    2023

  101. [109]

    Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer,

    C. Raffel, N. Shazeer, A. Roberts, K. Lee, S. Narang, M. Matena, Y . Zhou, W. Li, and P. J. Liu, “Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer,”Journal of machine learning research, vol. 21, no. 140, pp. 1–67, 2020

    2020

  102. [110]

    Sparsett: Visual tracking with sparse transformers,

    Z. Fu, Z. Fu, Q. Liu, W. Cai, and Y . Wang, “Sparsett: Visual tracking with sparse transformers,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.03776, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  103. [111]

    A survey on explainable anomaly detection for industrial internet of things,

    Z. Huang and Y . Wu, “A survey on explainable anomaly detection for industrial internet of things,” in2022 IEEE Conference on Dependable and Secure Computing (DSC). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–9

    2022

  104. [112]

    Survey on large language model-enhanced reinforce- ment learning: Concept, taxonomy, and methods,

    Y . Cao, H. Zhao, Y . Cheng, T. Shu, Y . Chen, G. Liu, G. Liang, J. Zhao, J. Yan, and Y . Li, “Survey on large language model-enhanced reinforce- ment learning: Concept, taxonomy, and methods,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2024

    2024

  105. [113]

    Seed-asr: Understanding diverse speech and contexts with llm-based speech recognition,

    Y . Bai, J. Chen, J. Chen, W. Chen, Z. Chen, C. Ding, L. Dong, Q. Dong, Y . Du, K. Gaoet al., “Seed-asr: Understanding diverse speech and contexts with llm-based speech recognition,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.04675, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  106. [114]

    B. Nong, X. Wang, H. Shi, J. Li, Y . Fang, C. Yin, Y . Wei, M. Zhu, D. Lu, D. Gan, J. Zhou, J. Lin, and S. Xie,A Structural Health Monitoring Method Based on Large Language Models, chinese patent cn118260345a ed., Guangxi Academy of Sciences, 98 Daling Road, Xixiangtang Distri...

    2024

  107. [115]

    A comprehensive survey of large language models and multimodal large language models in medicine,

    H. Xiao, F. Zhou, X. Liu, T. Liu, Z. Li, X. Liu, and X. Huang, “A comprehensive survey of large language models and multimodal large language models in medicine,”Information Fusion, p. 102888, 2024

    2024

  108. [116]

    Deep learning for time-series analysis,

    J. C. B. Gamboa, “Deep learning for time-series analysis,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.01887, 2017

    2017 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Time series forecasting with llms: Understanding and enhancing model capabilities,

    H. Tang, C. Zhang, M. Jin, Q. Yu, Z. Wang, X. Jin, Y . Zhang, and M. Du, “Time series forecasting with llms: Understanding and enhancing model capabilities,”ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 109–118, 2025

    2025

  110. [118]

    Accurate medium-range global weather forecasting with 3d neural networks,

    K. Bi, L. Xie, H. Zhang, X. Chen, X. Gu, and Q. Tian, “Accurate medium-range global weather forecasting with 3d neural networks,” Nature, vol. 619, no. 7970, pp. 533–538, 2023

    2023

  111. [119]

    Large language models for disease diagnosis: A scoping review,

    S. Zhou, Z. Xu, M. Zhang, C. Xu, Y . Guo, Z. Zhan, S. Ding, J. Wang, K. Xu, Y . Fanget al., “Large language models for disease diagnosis: A scoping review,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.00097, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Tutorial on variational autoencoders,

    C. Doersch, “Tutorial on variational autoencoders,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05908, 2016

    2016 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Generative adversarial net- works,

    I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y . Bengio, “Generative adversarial net- works,”Communications of the ACM, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 139–144, 2020

    2020

  114. [122]

    Privacy-preserving techniques in generative ai and large language models: A narrative review,

    G. Feretzakis, K. Papaspyridis, A. Gkoulalas-Divanis, and V . S. Verykios, “Privacy-preserving techniques in generative ai and large language models: A narrative review,”Information, vol. 15, no. 11, p. 697, 2024

    2024

  115. [123]

    Foundation model of ecg diagnosis: Diagnostics and explanations of any form and rhythm on ecg,

    Y . Tian, Z. Li, Y . Jin, M. Wang, X. Wei, L. Zhao, Y . Liu, J. Liu, and C. Liu, “Foundation model of ecg diagnosis: Diagnostics and explanations of any form and rhythm on ecg,”Cell Reports Medicine, vol. 5, no. 12, 2024

    2024

  116. [124]

    Efficient healthcare with large language models: optimizing clinical workflow and enhancing patient care,

    S. Tripathi, R. Sukumaran, and T. S. Cook, “Efficient healthcare with large language models: optimizing clinical workflow and enhancing patient care,”Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1436–1440, 2024

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.