REVIEW 5 cited by
FCoReBench: Can Large Language Models Solve Challenging First-Order Combinatorial Reasoning Problems?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Can the large language models (LLMs) solve challenging first-order combinatorial reasoning problems such as graph coloring, knapsack, and cryptarithmetic? By first-order, we mean these problems can be instantiated with potentially an infinite number of problem instances of varying sizes. They are also challenging being NP-hard and requiring several reasoning steps to reach a solution. While existing work has focused on coming up with datasets with hard benchmarks, there is limited work which exploits the first-order nature of the problem structure. To address this challenge, we present FCoReBench, a dataset of 40 such challenging problems, along with scripts to generate problem instances of varying sizes and automatically verify and generate their solutions. We first observe that LLMs, even when aided by symbolic solvers, perform rather poorly on our dataset, being unable to leverage the underlying structure of these problems. We specifically observe a drop in performance with increasing problem size. In response, we propose a new approach, SymPro-LM, which combines LLMs with both symbolic solvers and program interpreters, along with feedback from a few solved examples, to achieve huge performance gains. Our proposed approach is robust to changes in the problem size, and has the unique characteristic of not requiring any LLM call during inference time, unlike earlier approaches. As an additional experiment, we also demonstrate SymPro-LM's effectiveness on other logical reasoning benchmarks.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
PuzzleClone: A DSL-Powered Framework for Synthesizing Verifiable Data
A DSL plus SMT solver generates and validates 83,657 logic puzzles, and fine-tuning on them improves a 7B model's scores on several reasoning benchmarks.
-
Reasoning LLMs are Wandering Solution Explorers
Six current reasoning LLMs, including commercial systems, exhibit structured-search failures on verifiable computation tasks and degrade as the solution space grows.
-
ACCORD: Autoregressive Constraint-satisfying Generation for COmbinatorial Optimization with Routing and Dynamic attention
ACCORD rewrites combinatorial optimization solutions as step-by-step state updates that keep constraints visible, and this representation raises solution feasibility and lowers optimality gap versus list-of-list and p...
-
EnigmaEval: A Benchmark of Long Multimodal Reasoning Challenges
EnigmaEval is a private benchmark of 1,184 puzzle-hunt problems on which state-of-the-art vision-language models score 7.0% on normal and 0% on hard items.
-
A Neuro-Symbolic Approach for Reliable Proof Generation with LLMs: A Case Study in Euclidean Geometry
Retrieving analogous solved geometry problems and adding a symbolic verifier's feedback lifts reported LLM formal proof accuracy from 10-44% to 68-96% on SAT-level problems, though the evaluation may include the targe...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.