Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Shadowcast: Stealthy Data Poisoning Attacks Against Vision-Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.06659 v2 pith:N763KU6R submitted 2024-02-05 cs.CR cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG
keywords datashadowcastvlmsattackpoisoningsamplesattacksbenign
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel in generating textual responses from visual inputs, but their versatility raises security concerns. This study takes the first step in exposing VLMs' susceptibility to data poisoning attacks that can manipulate responses to innocuous, everyday prompts. We introduce Shadowcast, a stealthy data poisoning attack where poison samples are visually indistinguishable from benign images with matching texts. Shadowcast demonstrates effectiveness in two attack types. The first is a traditional Label Attack, tricking VLMs into misidentifying class labels, such as confusing Donald Trump for Joe Biden. The second is a novel Persuasion Attack, leveraging VLMs' text generation capabilities to craft persuasive and seemingly rational narratives for misinformation, such as portraying junk food as healthy. We show that Shadowcast effectively achieves the attacker's intentions using as few as 50 poison samples. Crucially, the poisoned samples demonstrate transferability across different VLM architectures, posing a significant concern in black-box settings. Moreover, Shadowcast remains potent under realistic conditions involving various text prompts, training data augmentation, and image compression techniques. This work reveals how poisoned VLMs can disseminate convincing yet deceptive misinformation to everyday, benign users, emphasizing the importance of data integrity for responsible VLM deployments. Our code is available at: https://github.com/umd-huang-lab/VLM-Poisoning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BadReward: Clean-Label Poisoning of Reward Models in Text-to-Image RLHF

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    BadReward uses clean-label feature-collision images to poison CLIP-based reward models so that a text-to-image model produces target attributes (e.g., glasses, skin tone, blood) when the trigger phrase is present.

  2. Poison Once, Control Anywhere: Clean-Text Visual Backdoors in VLM-based Mobile Agents

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Visual-only perturbations in fine-tuning screenshots can implant backdoors in VLM-based mobile agents, triggering attacker-chosen actions at inference.

  3. AdInject: Real-World Black-Box Attacks on Web Agents via Advertising Delivery

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fake 'Close AD' ads make VLM web agents click them over 60% of the time, and near 100% in some settings.

  4. A Survey of Safety on Large Vision-Language Models: Attacks, Defenses and Evaluations

    cs.CR 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey of LVLM safety that adds a lifecycle taxonomy and new benchmark results showing Janus-Pro-7B has weaker safety than several open-source LVLMs.

  5. Empowering Multimodal LLMs with External Tools: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey paper maps how external tools are used to augment multimodal large language models across data, tasks, evaluation, and future directions.

Pith tools