REVIEW 4 cited by
A Tale of Tails: Model Collapse as a Change of Scaling Laws
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As AI model size grows, neural scaling laws have become a crucial tool to predict the improvements of large models when increasing capacity and the size of original (human or natural) training data. Yet, the widespread use of popular models means that the ecosystem of online data and text will co-evolve to progressively contain increased amounts of synthesized data. In this paper we ask: How will the scaling laws change in the inevitable regime where synthetic data makes its way into the training corpus? Will future models, still improve, or be doomed to degenerate up to total (model) collapse? We develop a theoretical framework of model collapse through the lens of scaling laws. We discover a wide range of decay phenomena, analyzing loss of scaling, shifted scaling with number of generations, the ''un-learning" of skills, and grokking when mixing human and synthesized data. Our theory is validated by large-scale experiments with a transformer on an arithmetic task and text generation using the large language model Llama2.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
What Matters in LLM-generated Data: Diversity and Its Effect on Model Fine-Tuning
Moderately diverse LLM-generated data can improve fine-tuned model performance in low-data settings when distribution shift is minimal, while high diversity or large distribution shift hurts.
-
Epistemic diversity across language models mitigates knowledge collapse
In repeated self-training loops on Wikitext2, ecosystems of four small language models show lower average perplexity than one, two, or sixteen models, but the paper's broader claims about monotonic optima, robustness,...
-
Two Experts Are All You Need for Steering Thinking: Reinforcing Cognitive Effort in MoE Reasoning Models Without Additional Training
Reinforcing the two experts most correlated with thinking tokens improves reasoning accuracy and efficiency in MoE large reasoning models, with gains of up to 10 points on AIME benchmarks.
-
Securing High-Concurrency Ticket Sales: A Framework Based on Microservice
A railway ticketing system built from standard Spring Cloud components is reported to reach 817 req/s on a train-query interface, but only under a 100-thread local VM test with inconsistent purchase-interface data.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.