REVIEW 3 cited by
GhostWriter: Augmenting Collaborative Human-AI Writing Experiences Through Personalization and Agency
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have become ubiquitous in providing different forms of writing assistance to different writers. However, LLM-powered writing systems often fall short in capturing the nuanced personalization and control needed to effectively support users -- particularly for those who lack experience with prompt engineering. To address these challenges, we introduce GhostWriter, an AI-enhanced design probe that enables users to exercise enhanced agency and personalization during writing. GhostWriter leverages LLMs to implicitly learn the user's intended writing style for seamless personalization, while exposing explicit teaching moments for style refinement and reflection. We study 18 participants who use GhostWriter on two distinct writing tasks, observing that it helps users craft personalized text generations and empowers them by providing multiple ways to control the system's writing style. Based on this study, we present insights on how specific design choices can promote greater user agency in AI-assisted writing and discuss people's evolving relationships with such systems. We conclude by offering design recommendations for future work.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
VideoDiff: Human-AI Video Co-Creation with Alternatives
Aligned timeline and transcript views for multiple AI-generated video edits let creators compare and refine alternatives roughly twice as fast, with lower workload and higher final-video satisfaction, in a within-subj...
-
"Pragmatic Tools or Empowering Friends?" Discovering and Co-Designing Personality-Aligned AI Writing Companions
Writers grouped into four MBTI-based profiles showed divergent preferences for AI writing companion features, demonstrated by two contrasting prototypes in a small proof-of-concept study.
-
Humanlike Cognitive Patterns as Emergent Phenomena in Large Language Models
A literature review concludes that LLMs show partial humanlike cognitive patterns in bias, reasoning, and creativity, but the evidence is dominated by GPT models and the 'emergence' framing is not directly tested.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.