Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

GhostWriter: Augmenting Collaborative Human-AI Writing Experiences Through Personalization and Agency

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.08855 v3 pith:QOG2EZ5F submitted 2024-02-13 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords writingghostwriterpersonalizationagencydesignstyleuserscontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have become ubiquitous in providing different forms of writing assistance to different writers. However, LLM-powered writing systems often fall short in capturing the nuanced personalization and control needed to effectively support users -- particularly for those who lack experience with prompt engineering. To address these challenges, we introduce GhostWriter, an AI-enhanced design probe that enables users to exercise enhanced agency and personalization during writing. GhostWriter leverages LLMs to implicitly learn the user's intended writing style for seamless personalization, while exposing explicit teaching moments for style refinement and reflection. We study 18 participants who use GhostWriter on two distinct writing tasks, observing that it helps users craft personalized text generations and empowers them by providing multiple ways to control the system's writing style. Based on this study, we present insights on how specific design choices can promote greater user agency in AI-assisted writing and discuss people's evolving relationships with such systems. We conclude by offering design recommendations for future work.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. VideoDiff: Human-AI Video Co-Creation with Alternatives

    cs.HC 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Aligned timeline and transcript views for multiple AI-generated video edits let creators compare and refine alternatives roughly twice as fast, with lower workload and higher final-video satisfaction, in a within-subj...

  2. "Pragmatic Tools or Empowering Friends?" Discovering and Co-Designing Personality-Aligned AI Writing Companions

    cs.HC 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Writers grouped into four MBTI-based profiles showed divergent preferences for AI writing companion features, demonstrated by two contrasting prototypes in a small proof-of-concept study.

  3. Humanlike Cognitive Patterns as Emergent Phenomena in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A literature review concludes that LLMs show partial humanlike cognitive patterns in bias, reasoning, and creativity, but the evidence is dominated by GPT models and the 'emergence' framing is not directly tested.

Pith tools