REVIEW 1 cited by
Measuring Sharpness in Grokking
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Measuring Sharpness in Grokking
read the original abstract
Neural networks sometimes exhibit grokking, a phenomenon where perfect or near-perfect performance is achieved on a validation set well after the same performance has been obtained on the corresponding training set. In this workshop paper, we introduce a robust technique for measuring grokking, based on fitting an appropriate functional form. We then use this to investigate the sharpness of transitions in training and validation accuracy under two settings. The first setting is the theoretical framework developed by Levi et al. (2023) where closed form expressions are readily accessible. The second setting is a two-layer MLP trained to predict the parity of bits, with grokking induced by the concealment strategy of Miller et al. (2023). We find that trends between relative grokking gap and grokking sharpness are similar in both settings when using absolute and relative measures of sharpness. Reflecting on this, we make progress toward explaining some trends and identify the need for further study to untangle the various mechanisms which influence the sharpness of grokking.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
At-Grok Is Not Converged:A Measurement-Validity Audit for Grokking Representation Metrics
Embedding effective rank at grokking is a transient that overstates the converged floor by 3–5× (MLP) / 1.3–1.5× (transformer), and compression lags generalization by order T_grok, modulated by LayerNorm.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.