REVIEW 1 cited by
Bridging the Empirical-Theoretical Gap in Neural Network Formal Language Learning Using Minimum Description Length
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Neural networks offer good approximation to many tasks but consistently fail to reach perfect generalization, even when theoretical work shows that such perfect solutions can be expressed by certain architectures. Using the task of formal language learning, we focus on one simple formal language and show that the theoretically correct solution is in fact not an optimum of commonly used objectives -- even with regularization techniques that according to common wisdom should lead to simple weights and good generalization (L1, L2) or other meta-heuristics (early-stopping, dropout). On the other hand, replacing standard targets with the Minimum Description Length objective (MDL) results in the correct solution being an optimum.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Minimum Description Length Approach to Regularization in Neural Networks
MDL-based regularization, which balances data fit with a network's encoding length, preserves perfect solutions on several formal-language tasks, while standard L1, L2, and no regularization degrade them.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.