Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference Adjustment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.10207 v6 pith:3FSGNBUV submitted 2024-02-15 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords foundationmodelsalignmentadjustmentdynamicmulti-objectivepreferencesfine-tuning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the problem of multi-objective alignment of foundation models with human preferences, which is a critical step towards helpful and harmless AI systems. However, it is generally costly and unstable to fine-tune large foundation models using reinforcement learning (RL), and the multi-dimensionality, heterogeneity, and conflicting nature of human preferences further complicate the alignment process. In this paper, we introduce Rewards-in-Context (RiC), which conditions the response of a foundation model on multiple rewards in its prompt context and applies supervised fine-tuning for alignment. The salient features of RiC are simplicity and adaptivity, as it only requires supervised fine-tuning of a single foundation model and supports dynamic adjustment for user preferences during inference time. Inspired by the analytical solution of an abstracted convex optimization problem, our dynamic inference-time adjustment method approaches the Pareto-optimal solution for multiple objectives. Empirical evidence demonstrates the efficacy of our method in aligning both Large Language Models (LLMs) and diffusion models to accommodate diverse rewards with only around 10% GPU hours compared with multi-objective RL baseline.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GUI-Libra: Training Native GUI Agents to Reason and Act with Action-aware Supervision and Partially Verifiable RL

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Action-weighted SFT plus KL-regularized GRPO on a curated 81K reasoning dataset lifts open-source GUI agents by 11–22 points on online task-completion benchmarks.

  2. Simultaneous Multi-objective Alignment Across Verifiable and Non-verifiable Rewards

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MAHALO aligns LLMs to multiple objectives in one model via per-objective action heads and PRM-guided decoding, improving math, value, and tutoring metrics jointly.

  3. WST: Weak-to-Strong Knowledge Transfer via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    WST uses RL to train a small model to generate instructions that boost a larger model's benchmark performance, with reported gains of 98% on MATH-500 and 134% on HH-RLHF.

Pith tools