REVIEW 2 cited by
Improving Demonstration Diversity by Human-Free Fusing for Text-to-SQL
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Currently, the in-context learning method based on large language models (LLMs) has become the mainstream of text-to-SQL research. Previous works have discussed how to select demonstrations related to the user question from a human-labeled demonstration pool. However, human labeling suffers from the limitations of insufficient diversity and high labeling overhead. Therefore, in this paper, we discuss how to measure and improve the diversity of the demonstrations for text-to-SQL. We present a metric to measure the diversity of the demonstrations and analyze the insufficient of the existing labeled data by experiments. Based on the above discovery, we propose fusing iteratively for demonstrations (Fused) to build a high-diversity demonstration pool through human-free multiple-iteration synthesis, improving diversity and lowering label cost. Our method achieves an average improvement of 3.2% and 5.0% with and without human labeling on several mainstream datasets, which proves the effectiveness of Fused.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Filling Memory Gaps: Enhancing Continual Semantic Parsing via SQL Syntax Variance-Guided LLMs without Real Data Replay
LECSP uses LLM-generated pseudo-samples guided by SQL syntax differences between tasks, plus dual-teacher distillation, to train a continual semantic parser without replaying real historical data.
-
Exploring the Landscape of Text-to-SQL with Large Language Models: Progresses, Challenges and Opportunities
A systematic review organizing LLM-based text-to-SQL methods into pre-processing, in-context learning, fine-tuning, and post-processing paradigms, with a catalog of datasets, metrics, challenges, and future directions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.