Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Large Language Models for Causal Discovery: Current Landscape and Future Directions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.11068 v2 pith:ERVMKK6V submitted 2024-02-16 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords causalllmslanguagediscoveryfutureresearchcurrentintegration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Causal discovery (CD) and Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as transformative fields in artificial intelligence that have evolved largely independently. While CD specializes in uncovering cause-effect relationships from data, and LLMs excel at natural language processing and generation, their integration presents unique opportunities for advancing causal understanding. This survey examines how LLMs are transforming CD across three key dimensions: direct causal extraction from text, integration of domain knowledge into statistical methods, and refinement of causal structures. We systematically analyze approaches that leverage LLMs for CD tasks, highlighting their innovative use of metadata and natural language for causal inference. Our analysis reveals both LLMs' potential to enhance traditional CD methods and their current limitations as imperfect expert systems. We identify key research gaps, outline evaluation frameworks and benchmarks for LLM-based causal discovery, and advocate future research efforts for leveraging LLMs in causality research. As the first comprehensive examination of the synergy between LLMs and CD, this work lays the groundwork for future advances in the field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. KRCA: An Efficient Root Cause Analysis System in Hyper-scale Microservice Systems via Agentic AI

    cs.SE 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    KRCA uses API-level drilldown, skeleton causal graphs from anomalous metrics, and memory-augmented multi-agents to reach AC@1 of 0.88 for root cause localization and 0.79 for failure classification in hyper-scale micr...

  2. Position: The ML Community Must Build an AI-Augmented Peer-Review Ecosystem

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper argues that AI-assisted peer review is an urgent priority and that its success depends on collecting richer, structured peer review process data.

  3. Evaluating and Improving Robustness in Large Language Models: A Survey and Future Directions

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    LLM robustness research is organized into adversarial robustness, out-of-distribution robustness, and evaluation, with an accompanying GitHub collection of papers.

Pith tools