Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Vision-Flan: Scaling Human-Labeled Tasks in Visual Instruction Tuning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.11690 v1 pith:IWYKFD7T submitted 2024-02-18 cs.CL cs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.CV
keywords instructiontuningvisualdatagpt-4synthesizedchallengesframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite vision-language models' (VLMs) remarkable capabilities as versatile visual assistants, two substantial challenges persist within the existing VLM frameworks: (1) lacking task diversity in pretraining and visual instruction tuning, and (2) annotation error and bias in GPT-4 synthesized instruction tuning data. Both challenges lead to issues such as poor generalizability, hallucination, and catastrophic forgetting. To address these challenges, we construct Vision-Flan, the most diverse publicly available visual instruction tuning dataset to date, comprising 187 diverse tasks and 1,664,261 instances sourced from academic datasets, and each task is accompanied by an expert-written instruction. In addition, we propose a two-stage instruction tuning framework, in which VLMs are firstly finetuned on Vision-Flan and further tuned on GPT-4 synthesized data. We find this two-stage tuning framework significantly outperforms the traditional single-stage visual instruction tuning framework and achieves the state-of-the-art performance across a wide range of multi-modal evaluation benchmarks. Finally, we conduct in-depth analyses to understand visual instruction tuning and our findings reveal that: (1) GPT-4 synthesized data does not substantially enhance VLMs' capabilities but rather modulates the model's responses to human-preferred formats; (2) A minimal quantity (e.g., 1,000) of GPT-4 synthesized data can effectively align VLM responses with human-preference; (3) Visual instruction tuning mainly helps large-language models (LLMs) to understand visual features.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TaskGalaxy: Scaling Multi-modal Instruction Fine-tuning with Tens of Thousands Vision Task Types

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The authors release TaskGalaxy, a 413k-sample multimodal instruction dataset with 19,227 hierarchically organized task types, and report consistent benchmark gains when it is added to LLaVA-v1.5 and InternVL-Chat-v1.0.

  2. Pisces: An Auto-regressive Foundation Model for Image Understanding and Generation

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A unified image understanding and generation model with decoupled visual encoders achieves competitive benchmark scores on both tasks.

Pith tools