REVIEW 3 cited by
The Impact of Demonstrations on Multilingual In-Context Learning: A Multidimensional Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In-context learning is a popular inference strategy where large language models solve a task using only a few labeled demonstrations without needing any parameter updates. Although there have been extensive studies on English in-context learning, multilingual in-context learning remains under-explored, and we lack an in-depth understanding of the role of demonstrations in this context. To address this gap, we conduct a multidimensional analysis of multilingual in-context learning, experimenting with 5 models from different model families, 9 datasets covering classification and generation tasks, and 56 typologically diverse languages. Our results reveal that the effectiveness of demonstrations varies significantly across models, tasks, and languages. We also find that strong instruction-following models including Llama 2-Chat, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4 are largely insensitive to the quality of demonstrations. Instead, a carefully crafted template often eliminates the benefits of demonstrations for some tasks and languages altogether. These findings show that the importance of demonstrations might be overestimated. Our work highlights the need for granular evaluation across multiple axes towards a better understanding of in-context learning.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Evaluating the Capabilities of Large Language Models for Multi-label Emotion Understanding
A new multi-label emotion benchmark for four Ethiopian languages shows that fine-tuned encoder-only models outperform zero-shot and few-shot large language models, with large gaps between resource-rich and resource-po...
-
Accept or Deny? Evaluating LLM Fairness and Performance in Loan Approval across Table-to-Text Serialization Approaches
Serialization format and in-context examples change both accuracy and gender fairness of LLM loan approvals, with finance-tuned models often showing larger disparities.
-
INCLUDE: Evaluating Multilingual Language Understanding with Regional Knowledge
INCLUDE is a multilingual benchmark of 197,243 exam questions from local sources that evaluates how well LLMs handle regional and cultural knowledge.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.