MlingConf: A Comprehensive Study of Multilingual Confidence Estimation on Large Language Models
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:7WACDI4Irecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
The tendency of Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate hallucinations raises concerns regarding their reliability. Therefore, confidence estimations indicating the extent of trustworthiness of the generations become essential. However, current LLM confidence estimations in languages other than English remain underexplored. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a comprehensive investigation of Multilingual Confidence estimation (MlingConf) on LLMs, focusing on both language-agnostic (LA) and language-specific (LS) tasks to explore the performance and language dominance effects of multilingual confidence estimations on different tasks. The benchmark comprises four meticulously checked and human-evaluated high-quality multilingual datasets for LA tasks and one for the LS task tailored to specific social, cultural, and geographical contexts of a language. Our experiments reveal that on LA tasks English exhibits notable linguistic dominance in confidence estimations than other languages, while on LS tasks, using question-related language to prompt LLMs demonstrates better linguistic dominance in multilingual confidence estimations. The phenomena inspire a simple yet effective native-tone prompting strategy by employing language-specific prompts for LS tasks, effectively improving LLMs' reliability and accuracy in LS scenarios.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Estimating Uncertainty from Reasoning: A Large-Scale Study of Multi- and Crosslingual MCQA Performance in LLMs
A large-scale multilingual evaluation of LLM uncertainty estimation methods across 22 languages and 9 models finds that English reasoning closes the UE gap for low-resource languages and that optimal UE method choice ...
-
The Score Granularity Gap in Black-Box LLM Classification: A Comparative Study of Confidence Constructions
Comparative evaluation of seven confidence constructions across 25 LLM-dataset pairs reveals that verbalized scores provide good ranking but coarse granularity for thresholding, while multi-query aggregation helps wea...
-
Exploring LLM in Semantic Communication for V2X Networks
An LLM-integrated semantic framework for V2X claims a 33.54% average reduction in transmitted data volume in a multilane traffic simulation.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.