REVIEW 3 cited by
FanOutQA: A Multi-Hop, Multi-Document Question Answering Benchmark for Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
One type of question that is commonly found in day-to-day scenarios is ``fan-out'' questions, complex multi-hop, multi-document reasoning questions that require finding information about a large number of entities. However, there exist few resources to evaluate this type of question-answering capability among large language models. To evaluate complex reasoning in LLMs more fully, we present FanOutQA, a high-quality dataset of fan-out question-answer pairs and human-annotated decompositions with English Wikipedia as the knowledge base. We formulate three benchmark settings across our dataset and benchmark 7 LLMs, including GPT-4, LLaMA 2, Claude-2.1, and Mixtral-8x7B, finding that contemporary models still have room to improve reasoning over inter-document dependencies in a long context. We provide our dataset and open-source tools to run models to encourage evaluation at https://fanoutqa.com
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
MDBench: A Synthetic Multi-Document Reasoning Benchmark Generated with Knowledge Guidance
MDBench is a synthetically generated, knowledge-guided benchmark for multi-document QA on which frontier LLMs achieve only about 60% exact match.
-
NovelHopQA: Diagnosing Multi-Hop Reasoning Failures in Long Narrative Contexts
NovelHopQA is a new benchmark that pairs long novel excerpts with 1-4 hop questions and shows LLM accuracy drops consistently with both context length and reasoning depth.
-
OntoRAG: Enhancing Question-Answering through Automated Ontology Derivation from Unstructured Knowledge Bases
An automated pipeline derives an ontology from PDFs via LLMs and graphs, reporting higher comprehensiveness and diversity win rates than vector RAG and GraphRAG, but the evaluation is circular and artifacts are missing.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.