REVIEW 18 cited by
HALC: Object Hallucination Reduction via Adaptive Focal-Contrast Decoding
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
While large vision-language models (LVLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in interpreting multi-modal contexts, they invariably suffer from object hallucinations (OH). We introduce HALC, a novel decoding algorithm designed to mitigate OH in LVLMs. HALC leverages distinct fine-grained optimal visual information in vision-language tasks and operates on both local and global contexts simultaneously. Specifically, HALC integrates a robust auto-focal grounding mechanism (locally) to correct hallucinated tokens on the fly, and a specialized beam search algorithm (globally) to significantly reduce OH while preserving text generation quality. Additionally, HALC can be integrated into any LVLMs as a plug-and-play module without extra training. Extensive experimental studies demonstrate the effectiveness of HALC in reducing OH, outperforming state-of-the-arts across four benchmarks.
Forward citations
Cited by 18 Pith papers
-
Correcting Visual Blur Induced by Attention Distraction to Reduce Hallucinations: Algorithm and Theory
Object hallucinations in MLLMs track multi-head spatial inconsistency and temporal visual-attention fade; AFIP corrects both via cross-head enrichment and gated historical reinjection, reducing CHAIR/POPE rates training-free.
-
Visual Token Compression Enhances Robustness of MLLMs
Pruning visual tokens farthest from the text feature space at selected 'robust' layers improves MLLM jailbreak defense (average +13.29% RAR) and slightly reduces hallucination.
-
Two Causes, Not One: Rethinking Omission and Fabrication Hallucinations in MLLMs
Omission and fabrication hallucinations in MLLMs are claimed to have distinct causes, and the new VPFC method reduces omissions without adding fabrications.
-
Modality Bias in LVLMs: Analyzing and Mitigating Object Hallucination via Attention Lens
Modality bias, an imbalanced attention to text or image during hallucinated outputs, is shown to be mitigated by a training-free attention intervention plus contrastive decoding.
-
INTER: Mitigating Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models by Interaction Guidance Sampling
INTER is a training-free logit-correction method that adds Harsanyi interaction scores to selected keyword tokens, lowering hallucination on six LVLM benchmarks.
-
Not All Tokens and Heads Are Equally Important: Dual-Level Attention Intervention for Hallucination Mitigation
A dual-level attention intervention that boosts salient visual-token attention and suppresses text/system attention during decoding reduces hallucination rates in LLaVA, MiniGPT-4, and mPLUG-Owl2 on POPE and CHAIR.
-
Mitigating Object Hallucination via Robust Local Perception Search
A training-free decoding method that uses an MLLM's own local object descriptions as a reward prior, combined with CLIP similarity, to cut object hallucination, especially under adversarial image noise.
-
CLAIM: Mitigating Multilingual Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models with Cross-Lingual Attention Intervention
An inference-time attention-shift intervention aligns non-English queries' cross-modal attention with English, cutting multilingual object hallucination in LVLMs on POPE and MME.
-
Retrieval Visual Contrastive Decoding to Mitigate Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models
RVCD uses YOLO detections and retrieved single-concept AI images to adjust LVLM logits at decode time, cutting CHAIR hallucination rates by roughly half versus prior contrastive decoding baselines.
-
From EduVisBench to EduVisAgent: A Benchmark and Multi-Agent Framework for Reasoning-Driven Pedagogical Visualization
EduVisAgent, a five-agent framework, outperforms all baseline AI models at generating pedagogically effective interactive visualizations for STEM problems, according to the new EduVisBench benchmark and its GPT-4o-bas...
-
Disentangling Semantic Attention from Structural Bias in the Attention Manifold
SPAR removes a query-averaged structural bias from text-to-image attention and redistributes the reclaimed probability mass, reducing reported object and induced hallucinations in LLaVA models.
-
OmniDPO: A Preference Optimization Framework to Address Omni-Modal Hallucination
OmniDPO extends direct preference optimization with audio-video alignment and modality-degradation preference pairs to reduce omni-modal hallucination.
-
CAI: Caption-Sensitive Attention Intervention for Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models
CAI reduces object hallucination in LVLMs by injecting caption-query attention patterns into selected attention heads at inference time.
-
PostAlign: Multimodal Grounding as a Corrective Lens for MLLMs
MMGrounded-PostAlign trains MLLMs to produce a grounded object token or a rejection token plus selective rationales, improving hallucination and VQA benchmarks.
-
MCA-LLaVA: Manhattan Causal Attention for Reducing Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models
MCA-LLaVA reindexes image tokens by sums of mirrored 2D coordinates so instruction tokens attend across the whole image, reducing hallucination on POPE, CHAIR, and MME.
-
Mitigating Behavioral Hallucination in Multimodal Large Language Models for Sequential Images
SHE lowers behavioral hallucination scores by about 10 percent by detecting low visual-textual similarity and projecting out the hallucinated direction in embedding space.
-
Empowering Multimodal LLMs with External Tools: A Comprehensive Survey
A survey paper maps how external tools are used to augment multimodal large language models across data, tasks, evaluation, and future directions.
-
ASPO: Adaptive Sentence-Level Preference Optimization for Fine-Grained Multimodal Reasoning
ASPO's adaptive sentence-level loss, by the paper's own definitions, reduces exactly to the standard DPO loss, leaving no difference in the optimization objective.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.