Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Information Flow Routes: Automatically Interpreting Language Models at Scale

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.00824 v2 pith:QGHN52J3 submitted 2024-02-27 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords routesheadsinformationmodelpredictionautomaticallybehaviordomains
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Information flows by routes inside the network via mechanisms implemented in the model. These routes can be represented as graphs where nodes correspond to token representations and edges to operations inside the network. We automatically build these graphs in a top-down manner, for each prediction leaving only the most important nodes and edges. In contrast to the existing workflows relying on activation patching, we do this through attribution: this allows us to efficiently uncover existing circuits with just a single forward pass. Additionally, the applicability of our method is far beyond patching: we do not need a human to carefully design prediction templates, and we can extract information flow routes for any prediction (not just the ones among the allowed templates). As a result, we can talk about model behavior in general, for specific types of predictions, or different domains. We experiment with Llama 2 and show that the role of some attention heads is overall important, e.g. previous token heads and subword merging heads. Next, we find similarities in Llama 2 behavior when handling tokens of the same part of speech. Finally, we show that some model components can be specialized on domains such as coding or multilingual texts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Capturing Gaze Shifts for Guidance: Cross-Modal Fusion Enhancement for VLM Hallucination Mitigation

    cs.CV 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Tracking positive shifts in visual attention over information-rich query words yields a saliency map that, when used to boost visual and query attention during decoding, reduces object hallucination on CHAIR, POPE, an...

  2. Unraveling Syntax: Language Modeling and the Substructure of Grammars

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Language-modeling loss decomposes linearly over the sub-grammars of a probabilistic context-free grammar, and models learn these sub-grammars in parallel rather than in stages.

  3. Detection and Mitigation of Hallucination in Large Reasoning Models: A Mechanistic Perspective

    cs.AI 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A logit-lens divergence score over late layers is used to detect hallucinated reasoning traces and to shape reinforcement learning rewards, with results on math, science, and multi-hop QA benchmarks.

  4. SEReDeEP: Hallucination Detection in Retrieval-Augmented Models via Semantic Entropy and Context-Parameter Fusion

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    SEReDeEP replaces ReDeEP's lexical scores with semantic entropy probe scores, but its claimed 3-10% accuracy gains are contradicted by its own tables and its probes are trained on the evaluation datasets.

Pith tools