pith. sign in

arxiv: 2403.03162 · v2 · submitted 2024-03-05 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.stat-mech· physics.atm-clus

Statistical modeling of equilibrium phase transition in confined fluids

Gunjan Auti , Soumyadeep Paul , Wei-Lun Hsu , Shohei Chiashi , Shigeo Maruyama , Hirofumi Daiguji This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 03:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mechphysics.atm-clus
keywords confined fluidsphase transitionmetal-organic frameworksMOFsnanothermodynamicscapillary condensationfree energy barrierpore size
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fluids confined in larger pores of metal-organic frameworks undergo discontinuous first-order phase transitions, while those in smaller pores undergo continuous higher-order transitions with a lower free-energy barrier than bulk fluids.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a statistical model for phase transitions of fluids inside the heterogeneous structure of MOFs by approximating guest-guest interactions with mean-field theory and host-guest interactions with Mayer's f-functions in a unit cell. It then applies Hill's theory of nanothermodynamics to define differential and integral thermodynamic functions that describe how intensive properties vary and how phase transitions occur. The central finding is that pore size controls the nature of the transition: discontinuous in larger pores and continuous in smaller ones. This leads to a lower condensation pressure in confined systems because the free-energy barrier is reduced compared to bulk. The results are summarized in a phase diagram using the integral functions.

Core claim

By solving the three-dimensional Ising model with mean-field theory for guest-guest interactions and Mayer's f-functions for host-guest interactions within a unit cell, and using Hill's nanothermodynamics to obtain thermodynamic functions, the model reveals that confined fluids in larger pores exhibit discontinuous first-order phase transitions while those in smaller pores exhibit continuous higher-order phase transitions, accompanied by a lower free-energy barrier and thus lower condensation pressure relative to bulk saturation pressure.

What carries the argument

Mean-field approximation of guest-guest interactions combined with Mayer's f-functions for host-guest interactions in a unit cell, analyzed through Hill's nanothermodynamics to yield differential and integral thermodynamic functions.

If this is right

  • Fluids in larger pores show discontinuous phase transitions.
  • Fluids in smaller pores show continuous phase transitions.
  • The free-energy barrier is lower than in bulk fluids.
  • Condensation occurs at lower pressure than the bulk saturation pressure.
  • Integral thermodynamic functions can be presented as a phase diagram for confined fluids.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The model may help predict phase behavior in other nanoporous materials for applications like gas separation or storage.
  • Varying the pore size distribution in MOF synthesis could be used to tune the type of phase transition observed.
  • The framework provides a starting point for incorporating more detailed many-body effects beyond the mean-field approximation.

Load-bearing premise

The mean-field approximation for guest-guest interactions together with Mayer's f-functions for host-guest interactions in a unit cell sufficiently captures the many-body problem under the nonuniform external field of the MOF structure.

What would settle it

Experimental observation of the order of the phase transition (discontinuous versus continuous) and the condensation pressure in MOFs with pore sizes above and below a critical value would confirm or refute the predicted switch in transition type.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2403.03162 by Gunjan Auti, Hirofumi Daiguji, Shigeo Maruyama, Shohei Chiashi, Soumyadeep Paul, Wei-Lun Hsu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Statistical model for adsorbed fluid. (a) Schematic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Benchmarking of the model with GCMC simulations. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Types of phase transitions. Potential wells for fluid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Energy barrier for capillary condensation. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Phase diagram for argon adsorbed in a metal-organic framework (MOF). The integral properties are plotted in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The phase transition of confined fluids in mesoporous materials deviates from that of bulk fluids due to the interactions with the surrounding heterogeneous structure. For example, adsorbed fluids in metal-organic-frameworks (MOFs) have atypical phase characteristics such as capillary condensation and higher-order phase transitions due to a strong heterogeneous field. Considering a many-body problem in the presence of a nonuniform external field, we model the host-guest and guest-guest interactions in MOFs. To solve the three-dimensional Ising model, we use the mean-field theory to approximate the guest-guest interactions and Mayer's f-functions to describe the host-guest interactions in a unit cell. Later, using Hill's theory of nanothermodynamics, we define differential thermodynamic functions to understand the distribution of intensive properties and integral thermodynamic functions to explain the phase transition in confined fluids. The investigation reveals a distinct behavior where fluids confined in larger pores undergo a discontinuous (first-order) phase transition, whereas those confined in smaller pores experience a continuous (higher-order) phase transition. Furthermore, the results indicate that the free-energy barrier for phase transitions is lower in confined fluids than in bulk fluids giving rise to a lower condensation pressure relative to the bulk saturation pressure. Finally, the integral thermodynamic functions are succinctly presented in the form of a phase diagram, marking an initial step toward a more practical approach for understanding the phase behavior of confined fluids.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript models equilibrium phase transitions of fluids confined in MOFs by treating guest-guest interactions via mean-field solution of the 3D Ising model and host-guest interactions via Mayer f-functions inside a unit cell, then applies Hill nanothermodynamics to obtain differential and integral thermodynamic functions. It concludes that larger pores exhibit discontinuous (first-order) transitions while smaller pores exhibit continuous (higher-order) transitions, with a lower free-energy barrier than in bulk that produces a lower condensation pressure relative to bulk saturation pressure.

Significance. If the mean-field treatment is shown to correctly capture the pore-size dependence of transition order under the nonuniform MOF field, the work would supply a compact theoretical route to phase diagrams for confined fluids and a rationale for observed capillary condensation behavior in heterogeneous porous media.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract (modeling approach)] Abstract (modeling approach paragraph): the distinction between first-order and continuous transitions as a function of pore size is obtained from the mean-field Ising free-energy landscape; mean-field theory is known to suppress fluctuations that control barrier heights and can alter apparent transition order, yet no Monte Carlo validation, exact small-cell solution, or comparison to established confined-fluid benchmarks is described to confirm that the claimed pore-size dependence survives beyond the approximation.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract does not state the numerical values or ranges of the guest-guest and host-guest interaction strengths employed, nor the specific pore sizes that separate the first-order and continuous regimes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We respond point-by-point to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract (modeling approach paragraph): the distinction between first-order and continuous transitions as a function of pore size is obtained from the mean-field Ising free-energy landscape; mean-field theory is known to suppress fluctuations that control barrier heights and can alter apparent transition order, yet no Monte Carlo validation, exact small-cell solution, or comparison to established confined-fluid benchmarks is described to confirm that the claimed pore-size dependence survives beyond the approximation.

    Authors: We agree that mean-field theory for the Ising model neglects fluctuations, which can quantitatively affect free-energy barriers and, in some cases, the apparent order of a transition. In the present work the mean-field treatment is adopted deliberately to obtain a closed-form guest-guest contribution that can be combined analytically with Mayer f-functions for the nonuniform host-guest field and then inserted into Hill nanothermodynamics. The reported pore-size dependence of transition order therefore arises within this controlled approximation; it is not asserted to be fluctuation-corrected. Because the manuscript is a theoretical modeling study rather than a benchmark comparison, Monte Carlo or exact small-cell solutions were not performed. We have added a short paragraph in the revised Discussion section that explicitly states the mean-field limitation, notes that fluctuations would be expected to round or shift the transition, and suggests that future lattice Monte Carlo work on the same nonuniform field could test the robustness of the qualitative trends. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper defines a mean-field Ising model plus Mayer f-functions for host-guest interactions inside a unit cell, solves for thermodynamic quantities via Hill nanothermodynamics, and reports the resulting pore-size dependence of transition order and barrier height as model outputs. No quoted step equates a claimed prediction or first-principles result to its own inputs by construction, renames a fitted quantity as a prediction, or relies on a load-bearing self-citation whose content reduces to the present work. The derivation chain is self-contained as a forward computation from stated interaction approximations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two standard statistical-mechanics approximations whose validity for heterogeneous MOF fields is assumed rather than derived; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • guest-guest and host-guest interaction strengths
    Required to close the mean-field Ising equations; values not supplied in abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Mean-field theory approximates guest-guest interactions
    Invoked to solve the 3D Ising model for the confined fluid.
  • domain assumption Mayer's f-functions describe host-guest interactions in a unit cell
    Used to incorporate the nonuniform external field of the MOF structure.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5810 in / 1272 out tokens · 45581 ms · 2026-05-24T03:23:29.026305+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

115 extracted references · 115 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Canonical ensemble Equation (6b) shows that the kinetic-energy term is in- dependent of the position coordinate q and the potential- energy term is independent of the momentum coordinate p. Assuming that the confining framework is stationary and only fluid particles contribute to the kinetic energy, we separate the variables and define the canonical par- ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Grand canonical ensemble The equilibrium assumption implies that the chemi- cal potential µbulk of the bulk phase equals the chem- ical potential µtotal of the argon inside the nanospace. The chemical potential µtotal of argon inside the nanospace consists of contributions from other argon in- side nanospace ( µads) and from the framework atoms (µframe) t...

    work page

  3. [3]

    (27) where Ω bulk is the grand potential of the bulk fluid

    Grand potential ¯Ω ads The grand potential can be obtained from its definition Ω ads(x,y,z ) =−τln[Ξ ads(x,y,z )] =−τln(Ξ bulk)−τln[1 +ϕ(x,y,z )] = Ω bulk−τln[1 +ϕ(x,y,z )]. (27) where Ω bulk is the grand potential of the bulk fluid. Since we are interested in the integral properties inside the MOF pore, we spatially average the grand potential: ¯Ω ads = ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    (29) Combining Eqs

    Pressure ˆpads of adsorbed phase For any macroscopic system, we can write Et−TSt−µNt =−τln Ξt. (29) Combining Eqs. (3), (4), and (29), we obtain the integral pressure ˆpads of the adsorbed fluid in terms of the grand partition function: ξ≡ˆpadsV =τln Ξads =−¯Ω ads. (30) Therefore, ˆpads =−(¯Ω ads)µ,T V . (31)

    work page

  5. [5]

    Note that the term ⟨Nads(x,y,z )⟩is not the actual number of molecules at a given position but the expected number

    Expected number ⟨Nads⟩of molecules adsorbed The expected number ⟨Nads⟩of molecules adsorbed can be calculated as follows: ⟨Nads(x,y,z )⟩= ∑ NN ZadseµadsN/τ Ξ ads (32a) =⟨N⟩µads bulk +⟨N 2⟩µads bulkϕ(x,y,z ) 1 +⟨N⟩µads bulkϕ(x,y,z ) , (32b) where⟨N⟩µads bulk is the average number of molecules that would be present in the bulk if the chemical potential were...

    work page

  6. [6]

    (38) III

    Other thermodynamic functions The following standard thermodynamic relations still apply to the integral values: Entropy: ( ¯Sads) = (∂¯Ω ads ∂T ) p,µads , (35) Gibbs free energy: ( ¯Gads) =µads⟨Nads⟩, (36) Helmholtz free energy: ( ¯Fads) = ¯Ω ads +µads⟨Nads⟩, (37) Enthalpy: ( ¯Hads) = ¯Gads +T ¯Sads. (38) III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS A. Benchmarking We a...

    work page

  7. [7]

    gas-like ad- 9 sorbed phase

    Types of phase transitions Since the inception of fullerenes and 3D carbon nan- otubes with cylindrical pores, the phase-transitions inside these structures have been discussed [69]. Multiple stud- ies show that freezing of water confined in these struc- tures may occur continuously or discontinuously [70, 71]. The results in this section show that this t...

    work page

  8. [8]

    To elucidate this, we compare the nucleation of droplets in a bulk fluid with that in a confined fluid

    Capillary condensation Figure 4(a) shows that the phase transition for the adsorbed fluid occurs at a lower relative pressure than for the bulk phase transition. To elucidate this, we compare the nucleation of droplets in a bulk fluid with that in a confined fluid. As with macroscale condensation, capillary condensa- tion starts with the heterogeneous nuc...

    work page

  9. [9]

    gas-like

    constructed a phase diagram employing square-well potentials to account for external heterogeneity. Never- theless, this particular study does not consider the ex- cess chemical potential induced by external interactions, leading to unrealistically high pressures during capillary condensation. Figure 5(a) illustrates the 3D phase diagram of ad- sorbed arg...

    work page

  10. [10]

    Taverna, M

    D. Taverna, M. Kociak, O. St´ ephan, A. Fabre, E. Finot, B. D´ ecamps, and C. Colliex, Probing physical properties of confined fluids within individual nanobubbles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 035301 (2008)

    work page 2008

  11. [11]

    S. E. Sircar and A. L. Myers, Statistical thermodynam- ics of adsorption from liquid mixtures on solids. i. ideal adsorbed phase, J. Phys. Chem. 74, 2828 (1970)

    work page 1970

  12. [12]

    Evans, Fluids adsorbed in narrow pores: phase equi- libria and structure, J

    R. Evans, Fluids adsorbed in narrow pores: phase equi- libria and structure, J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2, 8989 (1990)

    work page 1990

  13. [13]

    R. E. Morris and P. S. Wheatley, Gas storage in nanoporous materials, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 4966 (2008)

    work page 2008

  14. [14]

    A. D. Jew, J. L. Druhan, M. Ihme, A. R. Kovscek, I. Battiato, J. P. Kaszuba, J. R. Bargar, and G. E. Brown Jr, Chemical and reactive transport processes associated with hydraulic fracturing of unconventional oil/gas shales, Chem. Rev. 122, 9198 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Krishnamurthy and B

    V. Krishnamurthy and B. Cornell, Engineering aspects of biological ion channels—from biosensors to compu- tational models for permeation, Protoplasma 249, 3 (2012)

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    Alabarse, J

    F. Alabarse, J. Haines, O. Cambon, C. Levelut, D. Bourgogne, A. Haidoux, D. Granier, and B. Coasne, Freezing of water confined at the nanoscale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 035701 (2012)

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    Algara-Siller, O

    G. Algara-Siller, O. Lehtinen, F. Wang, R. R. Nair, U. Kaiser, H. Wu, A. K. Geim, and I. V. Grigorieva, Square ice in graphene nanocapillaries, Nature 519, 443 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    Gimondi and M

    I. Gimondi and M. Salvalaglio, CO 2 packing polymor- phism under confinement in cylindrical nanopores, Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 3, 243 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Kapil, C

    V. Kapil, C. Schran, A. Zen, J. Chen, C. J. Pickard, and A. Michaelides, The first-principles phase diagram of monolayer nanoconfined water, Nature609, 512 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Hamada, K

    Y. Hamada, K. Koga, and H. Tanaka, Phase equilibria and interfacial tension of fluids confined in narrow pores, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 084908 (2007)

    work page 2007

  21. [21]

    Fumagalli, A

    L. Fumagalli, A. Esfandiar, R. Fabregas, S. Hu, P. Ares, A. Janardanan, Q. Yang, B. Radha, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, et al. , Anomalously low dielectric con- stant of confined water, Science 360, 1339 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Kavokine, M.-L

    N. Kavokine, M.-L. Bocquet, and L. Bocquet, Fluctuation-induced quantum friction in nanoscale wa- ter flows, Nature 602, 84 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    P. G. De Gennes, Polymer solutions near an interface. adsorption and depletion layers, Macromolecules 14, 1637 (1981)

    work page 1981

  24. [24]

    Fukui, H

    K. Fukui, H. Onishi, and Y. Iwasawa, Imaging of atomic-scale structure of oxide surfaces and adsorbed molecules by noncontact atomic force microscopy, App. Surf. Sci. 140, 259 (1999)

    work page 1999

  25. [25]

    Fukuma, Y

    T. Fukuma, Y. Ueda, S. Yoshioka, and H. Asakawa, Atomic-scale distribution of water molecules at the mica-water interface visualized by three-dimensional scanning force microscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 016101 (2010)

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    A. J. Page, A. Elbourne, R. Stefanovic, M. A. Addi- coat, G. G. Warr, K. Vo¨ ıtchovsky, and R. Atkin, 3- dimensional atomic scale structure of the ionic liquid– graphite interface elucidated by AM-AFM and quantum chemical simulations, Nanoscale 6, 8100 (2014)

    work page 2014

  27. [27]

    G. J. Wang and N. G. Hadjiconstantinou, Layered fluid structure and anomalous diffusion under nanoconfine- ment, Langmuir 34, 6976 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    J. W. Gibbs, The collected works of JW Gibbs (Long- mans, Green, 1928)

    work page 1928

  29. [29]

    T. L. Hill, Thermodynamics of small systems, J. Chem. Phys. 36, 3182 (1962)

    work page 1962

  30. [30]

    Ono and S

    S. Ono and S. Kondo, Molecular theory of surface ten- sion in liquids, in Structure of Liquids / Struktur der Fl¨ ussigkeiten(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Hei- delberg, 1960) pp. 134–280

    work page 1960

  31. [31]

    W. A. Steele and M. Ross, Distribution Functions of a Fluid in an External Potential Field: Application to Physical Adsorption, J. Chem. Phys. 33, 464 (1960)

    work page 1960

  32. [32]

    M. S. Wertheim, Fluids with highly directional attrac- tive forces. I. Statistical thermodynamics, J. Stat. Phys. 35, 19 (1984)

    work page 1984

  33. [33]

    M. S. Wertheim, Fluids with highly directional attrac- tive forces. II. Thermodynamic perturbation theory and integral equations, J. Stat. Phys. 35, 35 (1984)

    work page 1984

  34. [34]

    Wertheim, Fluids with highly directional attractive forces

    M. Wertheim, Fluids with highly directional attractive forces. III. Multiple attraction sites, J. Stat. Phys. 42, 459 (1986)

    work page 1986

  35. [35]

    Wertheim, Fluids with highly directional attractive forces

    M. Wertheim, Fluids with highly directional attractive forces. IV. Equilibrium polymerization, J. Stat. Phys. 42, 477 (1986)

    work page 1986

  36. [36]

    P. M. Biesheuvel, F. A. Leermakers, and M. A. C. Stu- art, Self-consistent field theory of protein adsorption in a non-gaussian polyelectrolyte brush, Phys. Rev. E 73, 011802 (2006)

    work page 2006

  37. [37]

    Y. M. Poluektov, Thermodynamic perturbation theory for classical systems based on self-consistent field model, Ukr. J. Phys. 60, 553 (2015)

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    M. Y. Laktionov, O. V. Shavykin, F. A. Leermakers, E. B. Zhulina, and O. V. Borisov, Colloidal particles interacting with a polymer brush: A self-consistent field theory, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 8463 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Sircar, Excess properties and thermodynamics of mul- ticomponent gas adsorption, J

    S. Sircar, Excess properties and thermodynamics of mul- ticomponent gas adsorption, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday 13 Trans. 1 81, 1527 (1985)

    work page 1985

  40. [40]

    Nicholson, Molecular theory of adsorption in pore spaces

    D. Nicholson, Molecular theory of adsorption in pore spaces. Part 1.—Isotherms for simple lattice models, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 71, 238 (1975)

    work page 1975

  41. [41]

    Nicholson, Molecular theory of adsorption in pore spaces

    D. Nicholson, Molecular theory of adsorption in pore spaces. part 2.—thermodynamic and molecular lattice model descriptions of capillary condensation, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 72, 29 (1976)

    work page 1976

  42. [42]

    Martinez, M

    A. Martinez, M. Castro, C. McCabe, and A. Gil- Villegas, Predicting adsorption isotherms using a two- dimensional statistical associating fluid theory, J. Chem. Phys. 126 (2007)

    work page 2007

  43. [43]

    Evans, U

    R. Evans, U. M. B. Marconi, and P. Tarazona, Fluids in narrow pores: Adsorption, capillary condensation, and critical points, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 2376 (1986)

    work page 1986

  44. [44]

    Schmidt and H

    M. Schmidt and H. L¨ owen, Phase diagram of hard spheres confined between two parallel plates, Phys. Rev. E 55, 7228 (1997)

    work page 1997

  45. [45]

    Kimura and S

    T. Kimura and S. Maruyama, Molecular dynamics sim- ulation of heterogeneous nucleation of a liquid droplet on a solid surface, Micr. Thermo. Eng. 6, 3 (2002)

    work page 2002

  46. [46]

    Radhakrishnan, K

    R. Radhakrishnan, K. E. Gubbins, and M. Sliwinska- Bartkowiak, Global phase diagrams for freezing in porous media, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 1147 (2002)

    work page 2002

  47. [47]

    Takaiwa, I

    D. Takaiwa, I. Hatano, K. Koga, and H. Tanaka, Phase diagram of water in carbon nanotubes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 39 (2008)

    work page 2008

  48. [48]

    Y. Zhou, M. Scheffler, and L. M. Ghiringhelli, Deter- mining surface phase diagrams including anharmonic effects, Phys. Rev. B 100, 174106 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Zhang, J

    Z. Zhang, J. A. Schott, M. Liu, H. Chen, X. Lu, B. G. Sumpter, J. Fu, and S. Dai, Prediction of carbon dioxide adsorption via deep learning, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 131, 265 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    Gurnani, Z

    R. Gurnani, Z. Yu, C. Kim, D. S. Sholl, and R. Ram- prasad, Interpretable machine learning-based predic- tions of methane uptake isotherms in metal–organic frameworks, Chem. Mater. 33, 3543 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    V. Fung, G. Hu, P. Ganesh, and B. G. Sumpter, Ma- chine learned features from density of states for accu- rate adsorption energy prediction, Nat. Comm. 12, 88 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    J. Cui, F. Wu, W. Zhang, L. Yang, J. Hu, Y. Fang, P. Ye, Q. Zhang, X. Suo, Y. Mo,et al., Direct prediction of gas adsorption via spatial atom interaction learning, Nat. Comm. 14, 7043 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Castelvecchi, Can we open the black box of AI?, Nat

    D. Castelvecchi, Can we open the black box of AI?, Nat. News 538, 20 (2016)

    work page 2016

  54. [54]

    Rudin, Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead, Nat

    C. Rudin, Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead, Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 206 (2019)

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    H. W. Lin, M. Tegmark, and D. Rolnick, Why does deep and cheap learning work so well?, J. Stat. Phys. 168, 1223 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    Koˇ smrlj and D

    A. Koˇ smrlj and D. R. Nelson, Statistical mechanics of thin spherical shells, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    C. P. Goodrich, E. M. King, S. S. Schoenholz, E. D. Cubuk, and M. P. Brenner, Designing self-assembling kinetics with differentiable statistical physics models, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e2024083118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    Molina, S

    A. Molina, S. Kumar, S. Karpitschka, and M. Prakash, Droplet tilings for rapid exploration of spatially con- strained many-body systems, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e2020014118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    J. N. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and surface forces (Academic press, 2011)

    work page 2011

  60. [60]

    T. L. Hill, A different approach to nanothermodynam- ics, Nano Lett. 1, 273 (2001)

    work page 2001

  61. [61]

    T. L. Hill, Thermodynamics of small systems (Courier Corporation, 1994)

    work page 1994

  62. [62]

    Travalloni, M

    L. Travalloni, M. Castier, F. W. Tavares, and S. I. San- dler, Critical behavior of pure confined fluids from an extension of the van der waals equation of state, J. Su- percrit. Fluids 55, 455 (2010)

    work page 2010

  63. [63]

    C. M. Simon, J. Kim, L.-C. Lin, R. L. Martin, M. Ha- ranczyk, and B. Smit, Optimizing nanoporous materi- als for gas storage, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 5499 (2014)

    work page 2014

  64. [64]

    C. M. Simon, E. Braun, C. Carraro, and B. Smit, Sta- tistical mechanical model of gas adsorption in porous crystals with dynamic moieties, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, E287 (2017)

    work page 2017

  65. [65]

    Singh, F

    N. Singh, F. Simeski, and M. Ihme, Computing ther- modynamic properties of fluids augmented by nanocon- finement: Application to pressurized methane, J. Phys. Chem. B 126, 8623 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    W. Dong, T. Franosch, and R. Schilling, Thermodynam- ics, statistical mechanics and the vanishing pore width limit of confined fluids, Comm. Phys. 6, 161 (2023)

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    J. E. Mayer, The statistical mechanics of condensing systems. i, J. Chem. Phys. 5, 67 (1937)

    work page 1937

  68. [68]

    J. E. Mayer and E. Montroll, Molecular distribution, J. Chem. Phys. 9, 2 (1941)

    work page 1941

  69. [69]

    Widom, Some topics in the theory of fluids, J

    B. Widom, Some topics in the theory of fluids, J. Chem. Phys. 39, 2808 (1963)

    work page 1963

  70. [70]

    T. L. Hill and S. Greenschlag, Statistical mechanics of monatomic systems in an external periodic potential field. I. Introduction, virial expansion, and classical sec- ond virial coefficient, J. Chem. Phys. 34, 1538 (1961)

    work page 1961

  71. [71]

    H. E. Stanley, Phase transitions and critical phenomena , Vol. 7 (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1971)

    work page 1971

  72. [72]

    Nicolis and I

    G. Nicolis and I. Prigogine, Exploring complexity: An introduction (1989)

    work page 1989

  73. [73]

    Kittel and H

    C. Kittel and H. Kroemer, Thermal physics freeman, San Francisco (1980)

    work page 1980

  74. [74]

    X. You, Y. Li, H. Mo, and Y. Gui, Theoretical studies on lennard-jones parameters of benzene and polycyclic aro- matic hydrocarbons, Faraday Discuss. 238, 103 (2022)

    work page 2022

  75. [76]

    Supplementary information, see Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for further infor- mation

    work page

  76. [77]

    G. Auti, Y. Kametani, H. Kimura, S. Paul, W.-L. Hsu, S. Kusaka, R. Matsuda, T. Uemura, S. Chiashi, and H. Daiguji, Effect of pore size on heat release from CO 2 adsorption in MIL-101, MOF-177, and UiO-66, J. Mat. Chem. A 11, 20043 (2023)

    work page 2023

  77. [78]

    Ball, New horizons in inner space, Nature 361, 297 (1993)

    P. Ball, New horizons in inner space, Nature 361, 297 (1993)

    work page 1993

  78. [79]

    K. Koga, G. Gao, H. Tanaka, and X. C. Zeng, Forma- tion of ordered ice nanotubes inside carbon nanotubes, Nature 412, 802 (2001)

    work page 2001

  79. [80]

    S. Han, M. Choi, P. Kumar, and H. E. Stanley, Phase transitions in confined water nanofilms, Nat. Phys. 6, 685 (2010). 14

    work page 2010

  80. [81]

    J. L. Rowsell, A. R. Millward, K. S. Park, and O. M. Yaghi, Hydrogen sorption in functionalized metal- or- ganic frameworks, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 5666 (2004)

    work page 2004

Showing first 80 references.