REVIEW 2 cited by
Incentivized Learning in Principal-Agent Bandit Games
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
This work considers a repeated principal-agent bandit game, where the principal can only interact with her environment through the agent. The principal and the agent have misaligned objectives and the choice of action is only left to the agent. However, the principal can influence the agent's decisions by offering incentives which add up to his rewards. The principal aims to iteratively learn an incentive policy to maximize her own total utility. This framework extends usual bandit problems and is motivated by several practical applications, such as healthcare or ecological taxation, where traditionally used mechanism design theories often overlook the learning aspect of the problem. We present nearly optimal (with respect to a horizon $T$) learning algorithms for the principal's regret in both multi-armed and linear contextual settings. Finally, we support our theoretical guarantees through numerical experiments.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Learning to Incentivize in Repeated Principal-Agent Problems with Adversarial Agent Arrivals
New adversarial-arrival principal-agent model with regret upper bounds for greedy and smooth agents, but the claimed matching lower bound for the smooth setting is invalid because the constructed instance is not L-Lipschitz.
-
Provably Efficient Algorithm for Best Scoring Rule Identification in Online Principal-Agent Information Acquisition
OIAFC and OIAFB identify an (epsilon, delta)-optimal scoring rule in online principal-agent information acquisition with instance-dependent sample complexity, but the proven rate differs from the advertised rate.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.