Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Are Language Models Puzzle Prodigies? Algorithmic Puzzles Unveil Serious Challenges in Multimodal Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.03864 v3 pith:KR2MGAZP submitted 2024-03-06 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords algorithmiclanguagepuzzlesdatasetreasoningvisualmodelsmultimodal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper introduces the novel task of multimodal puzzle solving, framed within the context of visual question-answering. We present a new dataset, AlgoPuzzleVQA designed to challenge and evaluate the capabilities of multimodal language models in solving algorithmic puzzles that necessitate both visual understanding, language understanding, and complex algorithmic reasoning. We create the puzzles to encompass a diverse array of mathematical and algorithmic topics such as boolean logic, combinatorics, graph theory, optimization, search, etc., aiming to evaluate the gap between visual data interpretation and algorithmic problem-solving skills. The dataset is generated automatically from code authored by humans. All our puzzles have exact solutions that can be found from the algorithm without tedious human calculations. It ensures that our dataset can be scaled up arbitrarily in terms of reasoning complexity and dataset size. Our investigation reveals that large language models (LLMs) such as GPT4V and Gemini exhibit limited performance in puzzle-solving tasks. We find that their performance is near random in a multi-choice question-answering setup for a significant number of puzzles. The findings emphasize the challenges of integrating visual, language, and algorithmic knowledge for solving complex reasoning problems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MIRAGE: Assessing Hallucination in Multimodal Reasoning Chains of MLLM

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MIRAGE is a benchmark that separates reasoning hallucinations from perception errors in multimodal LLMs, and Logos is a curriculum reinforcement fine-tuning method that reduces logical hallucinations.

  2. Lost in Time: Clock and Calendar Understanding Challenges in Multimodal LLMs

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new evaluation shows multimodal LLMs still fail at reading analogue clocks and doing calendar-based date reasoning, with large gaps across all seven tested models.

Pith tools