Pith. sign in

REVIEW 9 cited by

Common 7B Language Models Already Possess Strong Math Capabilities

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.04706 v1 pith:VGEWUJPV submitted 2024-03-07 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords mathmodelsaccuracycapabilitiescommondatagsm8kmathematical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Mathematical capabilities were previously believed to emerge in common language models only at a very large scale or require extensive math-related pre-training. This paper shows that the LLaMA-2 7B model with common pre-training already exhibits strong mathematical abilities, as evidenced by its impressive accuracy of 97.7% and 72.0% on the GSM8K and MATH benchmarks, respectively, when selecting the best response from 256 random generations. The primary issue with the current base model is the difficulty in consistently eliciting its inherent mathematical capabilities. Notably, the accuracy for the first answer drops to 49.5% and 7.9% on the GSM8K and MATH benchmarks, respectively. We find that simply scaling up the SFT data can significantly enhance the reliability of generating correct answers. However, the potential for extensive scaling is constrained by the scarcity of publicly available math questions. To overcome this limitation, we employ synthetic data, which proves to be nearly as effective as real data and shows no clear saturation when scaled up to approximately one million samples. This straightforward approach achieves an accuracy of 82.6% on GSM8K and 40.6% on MATH using LLaMA-2 7B models, surpassing previous models by 14.2% and 20.8%, respectively. We also provide insights into scaling behaviors across different reasoning complexities and error types.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mitigating Object Hallucination via Robust Local Perception Search

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A training-free decoding method that uses an MLLM's own local object descriptions as a reward prior, combined with CLIP similarity, to cut object hallucination, especially under adversarial image noise.

  2. Generalizable LLM Learning of Graph Synthetic Data with Post-training Alignment

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Post-training alignment on synthetic graph data yields statistically significant gains on some real-world implicit-graph tasks, but gains are inconsistent and multi-step reasoning remains fragile.

  3. How Much Backtracking is Enough? Exploring the Interplay of SFT and RL in Enhancing LLM Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On three controlled tasks, the optimal number of backtracks in SFT warm-up data grows with task difficulty, while trajectory correctness has little effect on final RL performance.

  4. Multimodal Behavioral Patterns Analysis with Eye-Tracking and LLM-Based Reasoning

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A human-AI framework uses horizontal and vertical segmentation with LLMs, expert co-scoring, and LSTM anomaly detection to extract behavioral patterns from eye-tracking data.

  5. We Should Identify and Mitigate Third-Party Safety Risks in MCP-Powered Agent Systems

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MCP-powered LLM agents are vulnerable to prompt injection from third-party services, and simple detection or filtering defenses do not reliably stop these attacks.

  6. SwS: Self-aware Weakness-driven Problem Synthesis in Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SwS uses failures during RL training to synthesize targeted math problems, improving reasoning accuracy on eight benchmarks.

  7. Paths to Causality: Finding Informative Subgraphs Within Knowledge Graphs for Knowledge-Based Causal Discovery

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A learning-to-rank model chooses informative knowledge-graph paths between entity pairs, and adding the top path to zero-shot prompts improves LLM causal classification by up to 44.4 F1 points.

  8. Two Experts Are All You Need for Steering Thinking: Reinforcing Cognitive Effort in MoE Reasoning Models Without Additional Training

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Reinforcing the two experts most correlated with thinking tokens improves reasoning accuracy and efficiency in MoE large reasoning models, with gains of up to 10 points on AIME benchmarks.

  9. A Survey on Large Language Models for Mathematical Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 1.0 of 10

    Recent advances in LLM mathematical reasoning are organized into comprehension and generation phases, covering methods from prompting to test-time scaling.

Pith tools