Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Online Contention Resolution Schemes for Network Revenue Management and Combinatorial Auctions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.05378 v3 pith:55OYLQTJ submitted 2024-03-08 cs.GT math.OC

classification cs.GTmath.OC
keywords ocrsrcrsstandardrandom-elementonlinedemandedsettingarrivals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the Network Revenue Management (NRM) and Online Combinatorial Auctions (OCA) problems, in which products composed of up to L resources are allocated in an online fashion. We take a randomized rounding approach to these problems, employing the modern tool of Online Contention Resolution Schemes (OCRS) and their random-order analogues (RCRS). However in NRM and OCA, there can be negative correlation in different products being demanded, making the standard definitions of OCRS/RCRS inapplicable. This motivates a new definition of random-element OCRS/RCRS, in which batches of elements arrive, and at most one element in each batch is demanded. We first establish a simple random-element OCRS for achieving the well-known guarantee of 1/(1+L). We then prove that this guarantee is a fundamental barrier---it is tight for all prime-power values of L, using a construction based on finite affine planes. Next, we break this barrier in several settings: the standard OCRS setting, on L-partite hypergraphs, and in the RCRS setting. The first setting importantly establishes a separation between standard and random-element OCRS, showing that the negative correlation between elements being demanded in random-element OCRS can actually worsen guarantees. We also establish a separation between standard and random-element RCRS. Although the general formulations of NRM and OCA require random-element OCRS, we also identify special cases in which standard OCRS or RCRS suffice. This includes establishing new reductions from NRM with Poisson arrivals to standard OCRS, and NRM with time-homogeneous Poisson arrivals to standard RCRS.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Competitive Bundle Trading

    cs.DS 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    An online retailer buying and selling bundles with inventory caps can guarantee profit within O((1/epsilon) log(dv)) of the offline optimum, with matching lower bounds.

  2. A Black-Box Approach for Exogenous Replenishment in Online Resource Allocation

    cs.DS 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A black-box batching extension preserves the competitive ratio of any online resource allocation algorithm under exogenous replenishment, asymptotically when starting inventory is large, plus an impossibility result f...

  3. Constant-Factor Algorithms for Revenue Management with Consecutive Stays

    econ.TH 2025-06 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new algorithmic framework guarantees a fixed fraction (between 15% and 63%) of optimal online revenue for consecutive-stay seat and room allocation, with or without customer choice.

  4. Forward-backward Contention Resolution Schemes for Fair Rationing

    cs.DS 2025-02 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Forward-backward random order improves contention-resolution guarantees to 0.622 for single-unit and 1/3 for knapsack, with the single-unit guarantee proven tight.

Pith tools