REVIEW 3 cited by
Measuring the Energy Consumption and Efficiency of Deep Neural Networks: An Empirical Analysis and Design Recommendations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Addressing the so-called ``Red-AI'' trend of rising energy consumption by large-scale neural networks, this study investigates the actual energy consumption, as measured by node-level watt-meters, of training various fully connected neural network architectures. We introduce the BUTTER-E dataset, an augmentation to the BUTTER Empirical Deep Learning dataset, containing energy consumption and performance data from 63,527 individual experimental runs spanning 30,582 distinct configurations: 13 datasets, 20 sizes (number of trainable parameters), 8 network ``shapes'', and 14 depths on both CPU and GPU hardware collected using node-level watt-meters. This dataset reveals the complex relationship between dataset size, network structure, and energy use, and highlights the impact of cache effects. We propose a straightforward and effective energy model that accounts for network size, computing, and memory hierarchy. Our analysis also uncovers a surprising, hardware-mediated non-linear relationship between energy efficiency and network design, challenging the assumption that reducing the number of parameters or FLOPs is the best way to achieve greater energy efficiency. Highlighting the need for cache-considerate algorithm development, we suggest a combined approach to energy efficient network, algorithm, and hardware design. This work contributes to the fields of sustainable computing and Green AI, offering practical guidance for creating more energy-efficient neural networks and promoting sustainable AI.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Energy Consumption in Parallel Neural Network Training
Energy use in data-parallel neural network training grows roughly linearly with GPU hours, but the energy cost per GPU hour varies by model, hardware, and the number of samples and gradient updates per GPU hour.
-
Frugal Bayesian Optimization: Scalable Surrogates for Data- and Resource-Limited Discovery
Across 17 benchmark and real-world tasks, non-GP surrogates (RF, NGBoost, BASS) match or beat Gaussian-process BO while using a fraction of the compute and memory, and a cheap-feature classifier can predict the best s...
-
AI Application Benchmarking: Power-Aware Performance Analysis for Vision and Language Models
No universal optimal GPU power limit exists for modern vision and language AI workloads; efficiency peaks and performance–energy trade-offs differ by application and by HBM-heavy GPU design.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.