Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Measuring the Energy Consumption and Efficiency of Deep Neural Networks: An Empirical Analysis and Design Recommendations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.08151 v1 pith:NCOE4HTI submitted 2024-03-13 cs.LG cs.AIcs.NE

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.NE
keywords energynetworkconsumptiondatasetneuraldesignefficiencynetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Addressing the so-called ``Red-AI'' trend of rising energy consumption by large-scale neural networks, this study investigates the actual energy consumption, as measured by node-level watt-meters, of training various fully connected neural network architectures. We introduce the BUTTER-E dataset, an augmentation to the BUTTER Empirical Deep Learning dataset, containing energy consumption and performance data from 63,527 individual experimental runs spanning 30,582 distinct configurations: 13 datasets, 20 sizes (number of trainable parameters), 8 network ``shapes'', and 14 depths on both CPU and GPU hardware collected using node-level watt-meters. This dataset reveals the complex relationship between dataset size, network structure, and energy use, and highlights the impact of cache effects. We propose a straightforward and effective energy model that accounts for network size, computing, and memory hierarchy. Our analysis also uncovers a surprising, hardware-mediated non-linear relationship between energy efficiency and network design, challenging the assumption that reducing the number of parameters or FLOPs is the best way to achieve greater energy efficiency. Highlighting the need for cache-considerate algorithm development, we suggest a combined approach to energy efficient network, algorithm, and hardware design. This work contributes to the fields of sustainable computing and Green AI, offering practical guidance for creating more energy-efficient neural networks and promoting sustainable AI.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Energy Consumption in Parallel Neural Network Training

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Energy use in data-parallel neural network training grows roughly linearly with GPU hours, but the energy cost per GPU hour varies by model, hardware, and the number of samples and gradient updates per GPU hour.

  2. Frugal Bayesian Optimization: Scalable Surrogates for Data- and Resource-Limited Discovery

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Across 17 benchmark and real-world tasks, non-GP surrogates (RF, NGBoost, BASS) match or beat Gaussian-process BO while using a fraction of the compute and memory, and a cheap-feature classifier can predict the best s...

  3. AI Application Benchmarking: Power-Aware Performance Analysis for Vision and Language Models

    cs.PF 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    No universal optimal GPU power limit exists for modern vision and language AI workloads; efficiency peaks and performance–energy trade-offs differ by application and by HBM-heavy GPU design.

Pith tools