Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

B-AVIBench: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Vision-Language Model on Black-box Adversarial Visual-Instructions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.09346 v2 pith:EBOAK5KB submitted 2024-03-14 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords lvlmsb-avisrobustnessb-avibenchtypesvisual-instructionsadversarialbias
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have shown significant progress in responding well to visual-instructions from users. However, these instructions, encompassing images and text, are susceptible to both intentional and inadvertent attacks. Despite the critical importance of LVLMs' robustness against such threats, current research in this area remains limited. To bridge this gap, we introduce B-AVIBench, a framework designed to analyze the robustness of LVLMs when facing various Black-box Adversarial Visual-Instructions (B-AVIs), including four types of image-based B-AVIs, ten types of text-based B-AVIs, and nine types of content bias B-AVIs (such as gender, violence, cultural, and racial biases, among others). We generate 316K B-AVIs encompassing five categories of multimodal capabilities (ten tasks) and content bias. We then conduct a comprehensive evaluation involving 14 open-source LVLMs to assess their performance. B-AVIBench also serves as a convenient tool for practitioners to evaluate the robustness of LVLMs against B-AVIs. Our findings and extensive experimental results shed light on the vulnerabilities of LVLMs, and highlight that inherent biases exist even in advanced closed-source LVLMs like GeminiProVision and GPT-4V. This underscores the importance of enhancing the robustness, security, and fairness of LVLMs. The source code and benchmark are available at https://github.com/zhanghao5201/B-AVIBench.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. High-Entropy Tokens as Multimodal Failure Points in Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    High-entropy tokens act as concentrated multimodal failure points in VLMs, enabling sparse Entropy-Guided Attacks that achieve 93-95% success and 30-38% harmful rates with cross-model transfer.

  2. USB: A Comprehensive and Unified Safety Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    USB-SafeBench is a unified MLLM safety benchmark with 61 risk categories, 4 modality combinations, and dual-language vulnerability and oversensitivity tests.

  3. A Survey of Safety on Large Vision-Language Models: Attacks, Defenses and Evaluations

    cs.CR 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey of LVLM safety that adds a lifecycle taxonomy and new benchmark results showing Janus-Pro-7B has weaker safety than several open-source LVLMs.

  4. When Data Manipulation Meets Attack Goals: An In-depth Survey of Attacks for VLMs

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey that classifies VLM attacks by goal and data manipulation strategy, and reviews defenses and metrics.

Pith tools