REVIEW 3 cited by
A Survey on Quality Metrics for Text-to-Image Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
AI-based text-to-image models do not only excel at generating realistic images, they also give designers more and more fine-grained control over the image content. Consequently, these approaches have gathered increased attention within the computer graphics research community, which has been historically devoted towards traditional rendering techniques, that offer precise control over scene parameters (e.g., objects, materials, and lighting). While the quality of conventionally rendered images is assessed through well established image quality metrics, such as SSIM or PSNR, the unique challenges of text-to-image generation require other, dedicated quality metrics. These metrics must be able to not only measure overall image quality, but also how well images reflect given text prompts, whereby the control of scene and rendering parameters is interweaved. Within this survey, we provide a comprehensive overview of such text-to-image quality metrics, and propose a taxonomy to categorize these metrics. Our taxonomy is grounded in the assumption, that there are two main quality criteria, namely compositional quality and general quality, that contribute to the overall image quality. Besides the metrics, this survey covers dedicated text-to-image benchmark datasets, over which the metrics are frequently computed. Finally, we identify limitations and open challenges in the field of text-to-image generation, and derive guidelines for practitioners conducting text-to-image evaluation.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Rethinking Machine Unlearning in Image Generation Models
A new taxonomy and multi-aspect evaluation framework for image generation unlearning, with a curated dataset, shows that ten existing unlearning methods perform poorly on preservation and robustness.
-
AMCR: A Framework for Assessing and Mitigating Copyright Risks in Generative Models
AMCR combines prompt sanitization, attention-based partial infringement detection, and a similarity-minimizing fine-tuning loss to reduce copyright infringement in text-to-image generation.
-
Towards Evaluating Robustness of Prompt Adherence in Text to Image Models
New benchmark results show that Stable Diffusion 3.x and Janus Pro models struggle to place simple geometric shapes in the correct image quadrant, with best F1 scores around 0.41 to 0.5.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.