Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Contextual Moral Value Alignment Through Context-Based Aggregation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.12805 v1 pith:3BRNUQOO submitted 2024-03-19 cs.AI cs.CL

Contextual Moral Value Alignment Through Context-Based Aggregation

classification cs.AI cs.CL
keywords moralvalueaggregationalignmentcontextualsystemagentsaligned
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Developing value-aligned AI agents is a complex undertaking and an ongoing challenge in the field of AI. Specifically within the domain of Large Language Models (LLMs), the capability to consolidate multiple independently trained dialogue agents, each aligned with a distinct moral value, into a unified system that can adapt to and be aligned with multiple moral values is of paramount importance. In this paper, we propose a system that does contextual moral value alignment based on contextual aggregation. Here, aggregation is defined as the process of integrating a subset of LLM responses that are best suited to respond to a user input, taking into account features extracted from the user's input. The proposed system shows better results in term of alignment to human value compared to the state of the art.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. User identity conditions moral wrongness ratings in non-reasoning large language models

    cs.CY 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Implicitly conveying a user's professional role in multi-turn LLM conversations shifts moral wrongness ratings across ten common-morality rules in two non-reasoning models.

  2. EvalMORAAL: Interpretable Chain-of-Thought and LLM-as-Judge Evaluation for Moral Alignment in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    EvalMORAAL evaluates moral alignment of 20 LLMs on World Values Survey and PEW data, reporting high overall correlation with human responses but a 0.21 gap between Western and non-Western regions.