Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

How Human-Centered Explainable AI Interface Are Designed and Evaluated: A Systematic Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.14496 v1 pith:SSE4KX47 submitted 2024-03-21 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords explainablesurveysystematicdesigninterfaceresearchuserusers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite its technological breakthroughs, eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) research has limited success in producing the {\em effective explanations} needed by users. In order to improve XAI systems' usability, practical interpretability, and efficacy for real users, the emerging area of {\em Explainable Interfaces} (EIs) focuses on the user interface and user experience design aspects of XAI. This paper presents a systematic survey of 53 publications to identify current trends in human-XAI interaction and promising directions for EI design and development. This is among the first systematic survey of EI research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond Explainable AI (XAI): An Overdue Paradigm Shift and Post-XAI Research Directions

    cs.CY 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Current XAI methods for DNNs and LLMs rest on paradoxes and false assumptions that demand a paradigm shift to verification protocols, scientific foundations, context-aware design, and faithful model analysis rather th...

  2. Human-Centered Explainability in Interactive Information Systems: A Survey

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A systematic review of 100 empirical user studies synthesizes explainability research into five conceptual dimensions, a design classification, and six measurement categories.

Pith tools