Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Computational Sentence-level Metrics Predicting Human Sentence Comprehension

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.15822 v2 pith:BZXR6XX4 submitted 2024-03-23 cs.CL stat.ML

classification cs.CLstat.ML
keywords metricssentencecomputationalpredictingsentence-levelacrosshumanlanguages
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The majority of research in computational psycholinguistics has concentrated on the processing of words. This study introduces innovative methods for computing sentence-level metrics using multilingual large language models. The metrics developed sentence surprisal and sentence relevance and then are tested and compared to validate whether they can predict how humans comprehend sentences as a whole across languages. These metrics offer significant interpretability and achieve high accuracy in predicting human sentence reading speeds. Our results indicate that these computational sentence-level metrics are exceptionally effective at predicting and elucidating the processing difficulties encountered by readers in comprehending sentences as a whole across a variety of languages. Their impressive performance and generalization capabilities provide a promising avenue for future research in integrating LLMs and cognitive science.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When the LM misunderstood the human chuckled: Analyzing garden path effects in humans and language models

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Humans and large language models show similar comprehension failures on garden-path sentences, with stronger models correlating more closely with human performance across three tasks.

Pith tools