Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Enhancing Legal Document Retrieval: A Multi-Phase Approach with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.18093 v1 pith:WUO7XAN4 submitted 2024-03-26 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords retrievalpromptinglargelegalsystemtechniqueslanguagellms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models with billions of parameters, such as GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and LLaMA, are increasingly prevalent. Numerous studies have explored effective prompting techniques to harness the power of these LLMs for various research problems. Retrieval, specifically in the legal data domain, poses a challenging task for the direct application of Prompting techniques due to the large number and substantial length of legal articles. This research focuses on maximizing the potential of prompting by placing it as the final phase of the retrieval system, preceded by the support of two phases: BM25 Pre-ranking and BERT-based Re-ranking. Experiments on the COLIEE 2023 dataset demonstrate that integrating prompting techniques on LLMs into the retrieval system significantly improves retrieval accuracy. However, error analysis reveals several existing issues in the retrieval system that still need resolution.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optimizing Legal Document Retrieval in Vietnamese with Semi-Hard Negative Mining

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A lightweight Bi-Encoder plus Cross-Encoder pipeline with random top-candidate negative sampling achieves 79.1% MRR@10 on Vietnamese legal retrieval.

Pith tools