Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Complementarity in Human-AI Collaboration: Concept, Sources, and Evidence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.00029 v2 pith:Z242WYEW submitted 2024-03-21 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords complementaritycollaborationhuman-aiperformancepotentialsourcesconceptdecision-making
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to significantly enhance human performance across various domains. Ideally, collaboration between humans and AI should result in complementary team performance (CTP) -- a level of performance that neither of them can attain individually. So far, however, CTP has rarely been observed, suggesting an insufficient understanding of the principle and the application of complementarity. Therefore, we develop a general concept of complementarity and formalize its theoretical potential as well as the actual realized effect in decision-making situations. Moreover, we identify information and capability asymmetry as the two key sources of complementarity. Finally, we illustrate the impact of each source on complementarity potential and effect in two empirical studies. Our work provides researchers with a comprehensive theoretical foundation of human-AI complementarity in decision-making and demonstrates that leveraging these sources constitutes a viable pathway towards designing effective human-AI collaboration, i.e., the realization of CTP.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DeCoDe: Defer-and-Complement Decision-Making via Decoupled Concept Bottleneck Models

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    DeCoDe combines concept bottleneck models with learning to defer to select per-instance among AI-only, human-only, and AI+human strategies, reporting accuracy gains over binary deferral baselines on three image datasets.

Pith tools