REVIEW 2 cited by
There and Back Again: A Netlist's Tale with Much Egraphin'
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
EDA toolchains are notoriously unpredictable, incomplete, and error-prone; the generally-accepted remedy has been to re-imagine EDA tasks as compilation problems. However, any compiler framework we apply must be prepared to handle the wide range of EDA tasks, including not only compilation tasks like technology mapping and optimization (the "there"} in our title), but also decompilation tasks like loop rerolling (the "back again"). In this paper, we advocate for equality saturation -- a term rewriting framework -- as the framework of choice when building hardware toolchains. Through a series of case studies, we show how the needs of EDA tasks line up conspicuously well with the features equality saturation provides.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Aligning Netlist to Source Code using SynAlign
SynAlign aligns post-synthesis netlists to source code lines using preserved names and structural graph matching, reporting average 75% accuracy without source locators.
-
Scaling Program Synthesis Based Technology Mapping with Equality Saturation
An equality-saturation-based mapper (Churchroad) decomposes large designs and auto-generates sketches, letting a synthesis tool map multi-DSP circuits it could not handle alone.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.