REVIEW 2 cited by
Optimization Methods for Personalizing Large Language Models through Retrieval Augmentation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper studies retrieval-augmented approaches for personalizing large language models (LLMs), which potentially have a substantial impact on various applications and domains. We propose the first attempt to optimize the retrieval models that deliver a limited number of personal documents to large language models for the purpose of personalized generation. We develop two optimization algorithms that solicit feedback from the downstream personalized generation tasks for retrieval optimization -- one based on reinforcement learning whose reward function is defined using any arbitrary metric for personalized generation and another based on knowledge distillation from the downstream LLM to the retrieval model. This paper also introduces a pre- and post-generation retriever selection model that decides what retriever to choose for each LLM input. Extensive experiments on diverse tasks from the language model personalization (LaMP) benchmark reveal statistically significant improvements in six out of seven datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Learning Preference Adaptation for Large Language Model Personalization via Verbal Reinforcement Learning
AlignXada uses verbal reinforcement learning to learn reusable text-rewriting policies that compress universal user preference profiles into task-specific ones, improving downstream personalization accuracy on most te...
-
Personalized Graph-Based Retrieval for Large Language Models
PGraphRAG adds neighbor-user reviews to LLM prompts and claims improved personalized generation, but its own ablations show the user's history contributes little beyond item context.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.