REVIEW 2 cited by
Does Transformer Interpretability Transfer to RNNs?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advances in recurrent neural network architectures, such as Mamba and RWKV, have enabled RNNs to match or exceed the performance of equal-size transformers in terms of language modeling perplexity and downstream evaluations, suggesting that future systems may be built on completely new architectures. In this paper, we examine if selected interpretability methods originally designed for transformer language models will transfer to these up-and-coming recurrent architectures. Specifically, we focus on steering model outputs via contrastive activation addition, on eliciting latent predictions via the tuned lens, and eliciting latent knowledge from models fine-tuned to produce false outputs under certain conditions. Our results show that most of these techniques are effective when applied to RNNs, and we show that it is possible to improve some of them by taking advantage of RNNs' compressed state.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Towards Understanding What State Space Models Learn About Code
SSM code models capture code syntax and semantics better than Transformers before fine-tuning, forget short-range structure when fine-tuned on type inference, and an added high-frequency path or more kernels recovers ...
-
Reproducing Recurrent Transformers: The CoTFormer
A reproduction of CoTFormer confirms its perplexity results, finds its adaptive-compute claims fragile, and shows looped computation benefits p-hop retrieval but not inductive counting.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.