REVIEW 3 cited by
Ada-LEval: Evaluating long-context LLMs with length-adaptable benchmarks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recently, the large language model (LLM) community has shown increasing interest in enhancing LLMs' capability to handle extremely long documents. As various long-text techniques and model architectures emerge, the precise and detailed evaluation of models' long-text capabilities has become increasingly important. Existing long-text evaluation benchmarks, such as L-Eval and LongBench, construct long-text test sets based on open-source datasets, focusing mainly on QA and summarization tasks. These datasets include test samples of varying lengths (from 2k to 32k+) entangled together, making it challenging to assess model capabilities across different length ranges. Moreover, they do not cover the ultralong settings (100k+ tokens) that the latest LLMs claim to achieve. In this paper, we introduce Ada-LEval, a length-adaptable benchmark for evaluating the long-context understanding of LLMs. Ada-LEval includes two challenging subsets, TSort and BestAnswer, which enable a more reliable evaluation of LLMs' long context capabilities. These benchmarks support intricate manipulation of the length of test cases, and can easily produce text samples up to 128k tokens. We evaluate 4 state-of-the-art closed-source API models and 6 open-source models with Ada-LEval. The evaluation results demonstrate the limitations of current LLMs, especially in ultra-long-context settings. Our code is available at https://github.com/open-compass/Ada-LEval.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Systematic Evaluation of Long-Context LLMs on Financial Concepts
GPT-4o and GPT-4-Turbo degrade significantly on financial news retrieval as context length grows, with performance collapsing on multi-concept tasks beyond 32K tokens.
-
100-LongBench: Are de facto Long-Context Benchmarks Literally Evaluating Long-Context Ability?
100-LongBench and LongScore evaluate LLMs at controlled context lengths and rank models by relative performance drop from a short-context baseline, not by raw accuracy.
-
ConTextual: Improving Clinical Text Summarization in LLMs with Context-preserving Token Filtering and Knowledge Graphs
ConTextual filters clinical notes to attention-important tokens, augments them with a patient-specific knowledge graph, and generates summaries that outperform several baselines on MIMIC-BHC and SOAP summarization benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.