REVIEW 2 cited by
Frontier AI Ethics: Anticipating and Evaluating the Societal Impacts of Language Model Agents
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Some have criticised Generative AI Systems for replicating the familiar pathologies of already widely-deployed AI systems. Other critics highlight how they foreshadow vastly more powerful future systems, which might threaten humanity's survival. The first group says there is nothing new here; the other looks through the present to a perhaps distant horizon. In this paper, I instead pay attention to what makes these particular systems distinctive: both their remarkable scientific achievement, and the most likely and consequential ways in which they will change society over the next five to ten years. In particular, I explore the potential societal impacts and normative questions raised by the looming prospect of 'Language Model Agents', in which multimodal large language models (LLMs) form the executive centre of complex, tool-using AI systems that can take unsupervised sequences of actions towards some goal.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The AI Agent Index
The AI Agent Index catalogs 67 deployed agentic AI systems and shows that most developers publicly disclose little about safety policies and evaluations.
-
On the Ethical Considerations of Generative Agents
Generative agents raise distinct ethical risks, including distorted interpretation of simulation results and supply-chain exploitation, which the paper argues deserve mitigation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.