Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Emerging Generative Artificial Intelligence Divide in the United States

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.11988 v3 pith:V7Y6APCR submitted 2024-04-18 cs.AI cs.CY

classification cs.AIcs.CY
keywords generativedividesearchartificialchatgptcountiesdigitaldivides
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The digital divide refers to disparities in access to and use of digital tooling across social and economic groups. This divide can reinforce marginalization both at the individual level and at the level of places, because persistent economic advantages accrue to places where new technologies are adopted early. To what extent are emerging generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools subject to these social and spatial divides? We leverage a large-scale search query database to characterize U.S. residents' knowledge of a novel generative AI tool, ChatGPT, during its first six months of release. We identify hotspots of higher-than-expected search volumes for ChatGPT in coastal metropolitan areas, while coldspots are evident in the American South, Appalachia, and the Midwest. Nationwide, counties with the highest rates of search have proportionally more educated and more economically advantaged populations, as well as proportionally more technology and finance-sector jobs in comparison with other counties or with the national average. Observed associations with race/ethnicity and urbanicity are attenuated in fully adjusted hierarchical models, but education emerges as the strongest positive predictor of generative AI awareness. In the absence of intervention, early differences in uptake show a potential to reinforce existing spatial and socioeconomic divides.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The AI Gap: How Socioeconomic Status Affects Language Technology Interactions

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Higher self-reported socioeconomic status is associated with shorter, more abstract, work-oriented chatbot prompts, while lower SES users show more concrete, polite, general-purpose interactions, patterns that may dee...

Pith tools