Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Watch Out for Your Guidance on Generation! Exploring Conditional Backdoor Attacks against Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.14795 v5 pith:RCLLWIBZ submitted 2024-04-23 cs.CL cs.CRcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.CRcs.LG
keywords generationconditionsattackbackdoorllmsunderabilityattacks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Mainstream backdoor attacks on large language models (LLMs) typically set a fixed trigger in the input instance and specific responses for triggered queries. However, the fixed trigger setting (e.g., unusual words) may be easily detected by human detection, limiting the effectiveness and practicality in real-world scenarios. To enhance the stealthiness of backdoor activation, we present a new poisoning paradigm against LLMs triggered by specifying generation conditions, which are commonly adopted strategies by users during model inference. The poisoned model performs normally for output under normal/other generation conditions, while becomes harmful for output under target generation conditions. To achieve this objective, we introduce BrieFool, an efficient attack framework. It leverages the characteristics of generation conditions by efficient instruction sampling and poisoning data generation, thereby influencing the behavior of LLMs under target conditions. Our attack can be generally divided into two types with different targets: Safety unalignment attack and Ability degradation attack. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that BrieFool is effective across safety domains and ability domains, achieving higher success rates than baseline methods, with 94.3 % on GPT-3.5-turbo

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLM in the Middle: A Systematic Review of Threats and Mitigations to Real-World LLM-based Systems

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic review that categorizes LLM threats, severity scores, and mitigations across development and operation life cycles and multiple deployment scenarios.

  2. Controlled LLM Decoding via Discrete Auto-regressive Biasing

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DAB biases auto-regressive LLM generation using discrete gradient-based MCMC on an auxiliary token sequence, improving constraint satisfaction with similar fluency and lower per-step cost.

  3. Layer-Wise Perturbations via Sparse Autoencoders for Adversarial Text Generation

    cs.CL 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Sparse autoencoder activation perturbation (SFPF) applied on top of existing jailbreak prompts raises attack success rate on Qwen3-32B, but with no defense evaluation and weak reproducibility.

  4. A Survey on Backdoor Threats in Large Language Models (LLMs): Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluations

    cs.CR 2025-02 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A literature review that taxonomizes LLM backdoor attacks and defenses by model construction phase, with no new experimental results.

Pith tools