Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

MDAgents: An Adaptive Collaboration of LLMs for Medical Decision-Making

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.15155 v3 pith:YSLEHK3I submitted 2024-04-22 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords medicalllmsmdagentscollaborationtasksbestdecision-makingknowledge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Foundation models are becoming valuable tools in medicine. Yet despite their promise, the best way to leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) in complex medical tasks remains an open question. We introduce a novel multi-agent framework, named Medical Decision-making Agents (MDAgents) that helps address this gap by automatically assigning a collaboration structure to a team of LLMs. The assigned solo or group collaboration structure is tailored to the medical task at hand, emulating real-world medical decision-making processes adapted to tasks of varying complexities. We evaluate our framework and baseline methods using state-of-the-art LLMs across a suite of real-world medical knowledge and medical diagnosis benchmarks, including a comparison of LLMs' medical complexity classification against human physicians. MDAgents achieved the best performance in seven out of ten benchmarks on tasks requiring an understanding of medical knowledge and multi-modal reasoning, showing a significant improvement of up to 4.2% (p < 0.05) compared to previous methods' best performances. Ablation studies reveal that MDAgents effectively determines medical complexity to optimize for efficiency and accuracy across diverse medical tasks. Notably, the combination of moderator review and external medical knowledge in group collaboration resulted in an average accuracy improvement of 11.8%. Our code can be found at https://github.com/mitmedialab/MDAgents.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 9 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. LiteOdyssey: A Lightweight Reasoning AI Agent for Interpretable Rare-Disease Diagnosis

    cs.AI 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A clinician-audited diagnostic policy plus public tools lets a single unmodified LLM reach high phenotype-first rare-disease Recall@1 and modestly beat baselines on real UDN patients.

  2. WSI-Agents: A Collaborative Multi-Agent System for Multi-Modal Whole Slide Image Analysis

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A route, verify, and summarize agent system uses existing pathology models and a knowledge base to select the best whole-slide image answer.

  3. TAGS: A Test-Time Generalist-Specialist Framework with Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning and Verification

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Without any parameter updates, a retrieval-augmented generalist-specialist agent pair with consistency-based verification raises accuracy on 862 hard medical QA questions for GPT-4o, DeepSeek-R1, and Qwen2.5-7B.

Pith tools