REVIEW 2 cited by
XC-Cache: Cross-Attending to Cached Context for Efficient LLM Inference
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In-context learning (ICL) approaches typically leverage prompting to condition decoder-only language model generation on reference information. Just-in-time processing of a context is inefficient due to the quadratic cost of self-attention operations, and caching is desirable. However, caching transformer states can easily require almost as much space as the model parameters. When the right context isn't known in advance, caching ICL can be challenging. This work addresses these limitations by introducing models that, inspired by the encoder-decoder architecture, use cross-attention to condition generation on reference text without the prompt. More precisely, we leverage pre-trained decoder-only models and only train a small number of added layers. We use Question-Answering (QA) as a testbed to evaluate the ability of our models to perform conditional generation and observe that they outperform ICL, are comparable to fine-tuned prompted LLMs, and drastically reduce the space footprint relative to standard KV caching by two orders of magnitude.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
FastSwitch: Optimizing Context Switching Efficiency in Fairness-aware Large Language Model Serving
FastSwitch reduces context-switching overhead in fairness-aware LLM serving with coarse-grained KV cache allocation, asynchronous multithreaded swapping, and KV cache reuse, reporting 1.4-11.2x tail-latency speedups o...
-
Explain-Query-Test: Self-Evaluating LLMs Via Explanation and Comprehension Discrepancy
A model's accuracy on questions it generates about its own explanations correlates with MMLU-Pro only at r = 0.361, and the paper claims this can serve as a test-set-free ranking proxy.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.