Pith. sign in

REVIEW 17 cited by

What matters when building vision-language models?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.02246 v1 pith:JMFMACRY submitted 2024-05-03 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords modelsdecisionsidefics2modeloftenperformancesizetraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The growing interest in vision-language models (VLMs) has been driven by improvements in large language models and vision transformers. Despite the abundance of literature on this subject, we observe that critical decisions regarding the design of VLMs are often not justified. We argue that these unsupported decisions impede progress in the field by making it difficult to identify which choices improve model performance. To address this issue, we conduct extensive experiments around pre-trained models, architecture choice, data, and training methods. Our consolidation of findings includes the development of Idefics2, an efficient foundational VLM of 8 billion parameters. Idefics2 achieves state-of-the-art performance within its size category across various multimodal benchmarks, and is often on par with models four times its size. We release the model (base, instructed, and chat) along with the datasets created for its training.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 17 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RADIO1D: Elastic Representations for Condensed Vision Modeling

    cs.CV 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    RADIO1D produces elastic hierarchical 1D visual tokens via multi-teacher distillation that match or beat fixed 2D encoders in VLMs at lower token counts.

  2. CARE-X: Towards Clinically Useful Radiology VLMs with Auxiliary Supervision, Reward-Aligned Learning, and Tool-Augmented Measurement

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A chest X-ray VLM co-trained with classification and grounding heads, tuned with DAPO reinforcement learning, and augmented with deterministic measurement tools outperforms prior radiology VLMs on report generation, V...

  3. E-THER: A Multimodal Dataset for Empathic AI -- Towards Emotional Mismatch Awareness

    cs.HC 2025-09 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    E-THER is a small annotated therapy-video dataset for verbal-visual incongruence, but the claimed empathy gains are supported mainly by author-built keyword metrics with statistical inconsistencies.

  4. Improving Large Vision and Language Models by Learning from a Panel of Peers

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A panel of LVLMs that generate, evaluate, and learn from each other's outputs improves average benchmark scores by 9 points across 15 tasks.

  5. Multi-TW: Benchmarking Multimodal Models on Traditional Chinese Question Answering in Taiwan

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Multi-TW is the first Traditional Chinese benchmark to evaluate multimodal models on both image-text and audio-text questions while also measuring inference latency.

  6. MMAT-1M: A Large Reasoning Dataset for Multimodal Agent Tuning

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new one-million-sample multimodal agent tuning dataset with GPT-4o-generated rationales, reflection, and tool/RAG calls is shown to improve fine-tuned models, though training/eval benchmark overlap is not addressed.

  7. Multimodal LLMs as Customized Reward Models for Text-to-Image Generation

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLaVA-Reward extracts reward scores from the hidden states of a multimodal LLM with a skip-connection cross-attention head, and reports state-of-the-art text-to-image evaluation across alignment, fidelity, and safety.

  8. Hidden in plain sight: VLMs overlook their visual representations

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    VLMs perform far worse than their own visual encoders on vision-centric tasks because the language model fails to use accessible visual information and instead follows its language priors.

  9. CoMemo: LVLMs Need Image Context with Image Memory

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CoMemo adds a cross-attention image-memory path and thumbnail-anchored position encoding to reduce visual neglect in long-context and multi-image LVLM tasks.

  10. Vision-Language Models Can't See the Obvious

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    On a new benchmark of odd-one-out images, state-of-the-art vision-language models, including GPT-4o, often fail to identify which low-level feature makes the odd object stand out.

  11. AIGVE-MACS: Unified Multi-Aspect Commenting and Scoring Model for AI-Generated Video Evaluation

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A finetuned vision-language model jointly predicts nine aspect scores and written comments for AI-generated videos, with a new benchmark and claims of state-of-the-art alignment with human judgment.

  12. CF-VLM:CounterFactual Vision-Language Fine-tuning

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CF-VLM fine-tunes VLMs on counterfactual image-text pairs with three objectives, reporting gains on compositional reasoning benchmarks and modest hallucination reductions.

  13. Mimicking or Reasoning: Rethinking Multi-Modal In-Context Learning in Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Vision-language models improve little, often not at all, when given demonstrations, even when demonstrations contain explicit reasoning steps.

  14. Stationary Power-Law Solutions of Kinetic-Alfv\'{e}nic Turbulence

    physics.plasm-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    The submission cannot be assessed because the supplied full text is a different paper than the abstract and metadata describe.

  15. Visual Language Models as Zero-Shot Deepfake Detectors

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Zero-shot VLMs scored by normalized yes/no token probabilities beat most trained deepfake detectors on a new SimSwap dataset, and a lightly fine-tuned InstructBLIP is near-perfect on DFDC-P.

  16. KptLLM++: Towards Generic Keypoint Comprehension with Large Language Model

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    KptLLM++ unifies keypoint semantic understanding, visual-prompt detection, and text-prompt detection in a single multimodal LLM, reporting SOTA accuracy on COCO, AP-10K, Human-Art, and other benchmarks.

  17. Empowering Multimodal LLMs with External Tools: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey paper maps how external tools are used to augment multimodal large language models across data, tasks, evaluation, and future directions.

Pith tools