Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Exploring the Interplay of Interpretability and Robustness in Deep Neural Networks: A Saliency-guided Approach

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.06278 v1 pith:XX4TBR7K submitted 2024-05-10 cs.CV cs.CR

classification cs.CVcs.CR
keywords robustnessmodelinterpretabilitywhileadversarialdeepsaliencyapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Adversarial attacks pose a significant challenge to deploying deep learning models in safety-critical applications. Maintaining model robustness while ensuring interpretability is vital for fostering trust and comprehension in these models. This study investigates the impact of Saliency-guided Training (SGT) on model robustness, a technique aimed at improving the clarity of saliency maps to deepen understanding of the model's decision-making process. Experiments were conducted on standard benchmark datasets using various deep learning architectures trained with and without SGT. Findings demonstrate that SGT enhances both model robustness and interpretability. Additionally, we propose a novel approach combining SGT with standard adversarial training to achieve even greater robustness while preserving saliency map quality. Our strategy is grounded in the assumption that preserving salient features crucial for correctly classifying adversarial examples enhances model robustness, while masking non-relevant features improves interpretability. Our technique yields significant gains, achieving a 35\% and 20\% improvement in robustness against PGD attack with noise magnitudes of $0.2$ and $0.02$ for the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets, respectively, while producing high-quality saliency maps.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Superposition

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper argues that adversarial examples arise from superposition, and shows that changing superposition changes robustness and vice versa in toy models and ResNet18.

  2. CoT-X: An Adaptive Framework for Cross-Model Chain-of-Thought Transfer and Optimization

    cs.AI 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An adaptive summarization framework compresses chain-of-thought traces and transfers them across model families, claiming up to 40.5% accuracy gains over truncation on medical QA and 84% fewer configuration evaluation...

Pith tools