REVIEW 2 cited by
Memory Mosaics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Memory Mosaics are networks of associative memories working in concert to achieve a prediction task of interest. Like transformers, memory mosaics possess compositional capabilities and in-context learning capabilities. Unlike transformers, memory mosaics achieve these capabilities in comparatively transparent way ("predictive disentanglement"). We illustrate these capabilities on a toy example and also show that memory mosaics perform as well or better than transformers on medium-scale language modeling tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Inference-time sparse attention with asymmetric indexing
Saap approximates attention by clustering keys with k-means and learning a query classifier, reducing KV-cache lookups about 20x at 4-5% selectivity with small accuracy loss on several long-context benchmarks.
-
Extending LLM Context via Associative Recurrent Memory
ARMT-augmented 1B-class LLMs, trained with continued pretraining, synthetic long data, curriculum, and selective memory layers, keep in-window quality while generalizing past 32k–65k tokens at constant memory and ~30%...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.