Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Large Language Model in Financial Regulatory Interpretation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.06808 v2 pith:EE67NAF7 submitted 2024-05-10 q-fin.RM cs.AIcs.CL

classification q-fin.RMcs.AIcs.CL
keywords llmsbaselcapitalfinanciallanguagelargemodelsregulatory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This study explores the innovative use of Large Language Models (LLMs) as analytical tools for interpreting complex financial regulations. The primary objective is to design effective prompts that guide LLMs in distilling verbose and intricate regulatory texts, such as the Basel III capital requirement regulations, into a concise mathematical framework that can be subsequently translated into actionable code. This novel approach aims to streamline the implementation of regulatory mandates within the financial reporting and risk management systems of global banking institutions. A case study was conducted to assess the performance of various LLMs, demonstrating that GPT-4 outperforms other models in processing and collecting necessary information, as well as executing mathematical calculations. The case study utilized numerical simulations with asset holdings -- including fixed income, equities, currency pairs, and commodities -- to demonstrate how LLMs can effectively implement the Basel III capital adequacy requirements. Keywords: Large Language Models, Prompt Engineering, LLMs in Finance, Basel III, Minimum Capital Requirements, LLM Ethics

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 4 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Dynamic benchmarking framework for LLM-based conversational data capture

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An LLM-based framework that benchmarks conversational data capture using synthetic users, applied to loan applications, shows adaptive follow-up questions improve extraction accuracy.

Pith tools