Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Addressing Misspecification in Simulation-based Inference through Data-driven Calibration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.08719 v2 pith:V7OWCYFS submitted 2024-05-14 stat.ML cs.LGstat.ME

classification stat.MLcs.LGstat.ME
keywords misspecificationropecalibrationinferencemodelreal-worldsimulatorscalibrated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Driven by steady progress in deep generative modeling, simulation-based inference (SBI) has emerged as the workhorse for inferring the parameters of stochastic simulators. However, recent work has demonstrated that model misspecification can compromise the reliability of SBI, preventing its adoption in important applications where only misspecified simulators are available. This work introduces robust posterior estimation~(RoPE), a framework that overcomes model misspecification with a small real-world calibration set of ground-truth parameter measurements. We formalize the misspecification gap as the solution of an optimal transport~(OT) problem between learned representations of real-world and simulated observations, allowing RoPE to learn a model of the misspecification without placing additional assumptions on its nature. RoPE demonstrates how OT and a calibration set provide a controllable balance between calibrated uncertainty and informative inference, even under severely misspecified simulators. Results on four synthetic tasks and two real-world problems with ground-truth labels demonstrate that RoPE outperforms baselines and consistently returns informative and calibrated credible intervals.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Does Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Improve the Robustness of Amortized Bayesian Inference? A Systematic Evaluation

    stat.ML 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Aligning simulated and observed summaries improves neural Bayesian inference under likelihood misspecification but degrades it under prior misspecification.

  2. An Introduction to Bayesian and Frequentist Simulation-Based Inference with Machine Learning

    cs.LG 2026-07 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

    A structured introduction to ML-based simulation-based inference, contrasting Bayesian and frequentist frameworks and covering parameter inference, unfolding, and validation.

Pith tools