Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

COGNET-MD, an evaluation framework and dataset for Large Language Model benchmarks in the medical domain

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.10893 v1 pith:BITMLY2U submitted 2024-05-17 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords medicaldomainsevaluationcognet-mdcurrentdatabasedifficultydomain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) constitute a breakthrough state-of-the-art Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology which is rapidly evolving and promises to aid in medical diagnosis either by assisting doctors or by simulating a doctor's workflow in more advanced and complex implementations. In this technical paper, we outline Cognitive Network Evaluation Toolkit for Medical Domains (COGNET-MD), which constitutes a novel benchmark for LLM evaluation in the medical domain. Specifically, we propose a scoring-framework with increased difficulty to assess the ability of LLMs in interpreting medical text. The proposed framework is accompanied with a database of Multiple Choice Quizzes (MCQs). To ensure alignment with current medical trends and enhance safety, usefulness, and applicability, these MCQs have been constructed in collaboration with several associated medical experts in various medical domains and are characterized by varying degrees of difficulty. The current (first) version of the database includes the medical domains of Psychiatry, Dentistry, Pulmonology, Dermatology and Endocrinology, but it will be continuously extended and expanded to include additional medical domains.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MedSentry: Understanding and Mitigating Safety Risks in Medical LLM Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.MA 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 5,000-prompt medical safety benchmark reveals that decentralized LLM multi-agent teams resist a malicious insider agent better than shared-pool teams, and a personality-screening defense partially restores safety.

  2. Generalization of Medical Large Language Models through Cross-Domain Weak Supervision

    cs.CL 2025-02 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A claimed curriculum-based fine-tuning framework for medical LLMs reports better question answering and response generation, but lacks reproducible evidence.

Pith tools