Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Large-Scale Multi-Center CT and MRI Segmentation of Pancreas with Deep Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.12367 v3 pith:DXPBCXBH submitted 2024-05-20 eess.IV cs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords segmentationavailablepancreasdicepansegnetrespectivelyscansaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automated volumetric segmentation of the pancreas on cross-sectional imaging is needed for diagnosis and follow-up of pancreatic diseases. While CT-based pancreatic segmentation is more established, MRI-based segmentation methods are understudied, largely due to a lack of publicly available datasets, benchmarking research efforts, and domain-specific deep learning methods. In this retrospective study, we collected a large dataset (767 scans from 499 participants) of T1-weighted (T1W) and T2-weighted (T2W) abdominal MRI series from five centers between March 2004 and November 2022. We also collected CT scans of 1,350 patients from publicly available sources for benchmarking purposes. We developed a new pancreas segmentation method, called PanSegNet, combining the strengths of nnUNet and a Transformer network with a new linear attention module enabling volumetric computation. We tested PanSegNet's accuracy in cross-modality (a total of 2,117 scans) and cross-center settings with Dice and Hausdorff distance (HD95) evaluation metrics. We used Cohen's kappa statistics for intra and inter-rater agreement evaluation and paired t-tests for volume and Dice comparisons, respectively. For segmentation accuracy, we achieved Dice coefficients of 88.3% (std: 7.2%, at case level) with CT, 85.0% (std: 7.9%) with T1W MRI, and 86.3% (std: 6.4%) with T2W MRI. There was a high correlation for pancreas volume prediction with R^2 of 0.91, 0.84, and 0.85 for CT, T1W, and T2W, respectively. We found moderate inter-observer (0.624 and 0.638 for T1W and T2W MRI, respectively) and high intra-observer agreement scores. All MRI data is made available at https://osf.io/kysnj/. Our source code is available at https://github.com/NUBagciLab/PaNSegNet.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MedSeqFT: Sequential Fine-tuning Foundation Models for 3D Medical Image Segmentation

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Sequential fine-tuning with similarity-based data buffering and LoRA knowledge distillation improves 3D medical segmentation over parallel and multi-task fine-tuning.

  2. TAGS: 3D Tumor-Adaptive Guidance for SAM

    eess.IV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A SAM-based 3D tumor segmentation framework combining TotalSegmentator organ masks, CLIP text guidance, and multi-stage adapters outperforms several medical segmentation baselines on three CT datasets.

  3. Federated prediction for scalable and privacy-preserved knowledge-based planning in radiotherapy

    cs.DC 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    FedKBP+ is a gRPC-based federated learning platform for radiotherapy that supports centralized and peer-to-peer training, with experiments showing accuracy near pooled-data training across dose prediction, tumor segme...

Pith tools