Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Explaining Multi-modal Large Language Models by Analyzing their Vision Perception

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.14612 v2 pith:T6ZZAANW submitted 2024-05-23 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords interpretabilitymodelarchitectureembeddinglanguagelargelocalizationmllms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding and generating content across various modalities, such as images and text. However, their interpretability remains a challenge, hindering their adoption in critical applications. This research proposes a novel approach to enhance the interpretability of MLLMs by focusing on the image embedding component. We combine an open-world localization model with a MLLM, thus creating a new architecture able to simultaneously produce text and object localization outputs from the same vision embedding. The proposed architecture greatly promotes interpretability, enabling us to design a novel saliency map to explain any output token, to identify model hallucinations, and to assess model biases through semantic adversarial perturbations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Seeing It or Not? Interpretable Vision-aware Latent Steering to Mitigate Object Hallucinations

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    VaLSe uses attention-based visual contribution maps to steer an LVLM's latent features toward visually grounded content, reducing object hallucinations on several benchmarks while exposing flaws in CHAIR-style evaluation.

Pith tools