Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

QUBIQ: Uncertainty Quantification for Biomedical Image Segmentation Challenge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.18435 v2 pith:W23UK3P7 submitted 2024-03-19 eess.IV cs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords imagesegmentationquantificationchallengemedicaluncertaintyvariabilityvarious
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Uncertainty in medical image segmentation tasks, especially inter-rater variability, arising from differences in interpretations and annotations by various experts, presents a significant challenge in achieving consistent and reliable image segmentation. This variability not only reflects the inherent complexity and subjective nature of medical image interpretation but also directly impacts the development and evaluation of automated segmentation algorithms. Accurately modeling and quantifying this variability is essential for enhancing the robustness and clinical applicability of these algorithms. We report the set-up and summarize the benchmark results of the Quantification of Uncertainties in Biomedical Image Quantification Challenge (QUBIQ), which was organized in conjunction with International Conferences on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2020 and 2021. The challenge focuses on the uncertainty quantification of medical image segmentation which considers the omnipresence of inter-rater variability in imaging datasets. The large collection of images with multi-rater annotations features various modalities such as MRI and CT; various organs such as the brain, prostate, kidney, and pancreas; and different image dimensions 2D-vs-3D. A total of 24 teams submitted different solutions to the problem, combining various baseline models, Bayesian neural networks, and ensemble model techniques. The obtained results indicate the importance of the ensemble models, as well as the need for further research to develop efficient 3D methods for uncertainty quantification methods in 3D segmentation tasks.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. IMA++: ISIC Archive Multi-Annotator Dermoscopic Skin Lesion Segmentation Dataset

    cs.CV 2025-12 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    IMA++ is a new public dataset of 17,684 dermoscopic skin-lesion segmentation masks across 14,967 images, with 2,394 images carrying multiple annotations.

  2. Flow Stochastic Segmentation Networks

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Flow-SSNs model high-rank pixel covariances for ambiguous medical image segmentation by mapping a learned diagonal-Gaussian prior through a lightweight flow, outperforming prior SOTA with fewer parameters.

Pith tools