Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Reconstructing Interpretable Features in Computational Super-Resolution microscopy via Regularized Latent Search

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.19112 v1 pith:URPUWV2Y submitted 2024-05-29 eess.IV cs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords imageimagesfeatureshigh-resolutionincreaseinterpretablelatentlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Supervised deep learning approaches can artificially increase the resolution of microscopy images by learning a mapping between two image resolutions or modalities. However, such methods often require a large set of hard-to-get low-res/high-res image pairs and produce synthetic images with a moderate increase in resolution. Conversely, recent methods based on GAN latent search offered a drastic increase in resolution without the need of paired images. However, they offer limited reconstruction of the high-resolution image interpretable features. Here, we propose a robust super-resolution method based on regularized latent search~(RLS) that offers an actionable balance between fidelity to the ground-truth and realism of the recovered image given a distribution prior. The latter allows to split the analysis of a low-resolution image into a computational super-resolution task performed by deep learning followed by a quantification task performed by a handcrafted algorithm and based on interpretable biological features. This two-step process holds potential for various applications such as diagnostics on mobile devices, where the main aim is not to recover the high-resolution details of a specific sample but rather to obtain high-resolution images that preserve explainable and quantifiable differences between conditions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools